this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
82 points (98.8% liked)

No Stupid Questions

40029 readers
796 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 87 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I've noticed a correlation between people who think the tariffs are a good idea, and people who have no clue what tariffs are.

[–] troglodytis@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

Similar number of people think the president actually has the authority to do this.

Congress is just fucking off

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

While it's true in the majority of cases, it's not a one to one relationship.

There's a few billionaire numpties who will eat regardless and see it as a way to reduce wages even further whilst charging more for their products .. profit!

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There’s a few billionaire numptie

Like who?

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 4 points 1 week ago

The ones running the country!

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 0 points 1 week ago

It’ll increase wages.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

God dammit. I was trying to make a joke about the correlation between the people I see breathing oxygen, and the stupid people I see. Then I was going to say there's also a correlation between the people I see NOT breathing oxygen, and also turning blue and falling to the floor.

Then I realized the joke made it sound like I was defending tarrifs. Which wasn't the point I wanted to be making. So then I tried making a joke about there being a correlation between fat americans, and eating fast food. But then the joke wasn't even funny, or random. It was just boring.

So then I saw a bird outside, and remembered I have a low attention span. So I ran outside to look at the bird. He looked back at me like "Why are you looking at me, human? I'm just sitting here being a bird. Are you trying to watch me poop? You are, aren't you? You realize that birds have no sphincter. So if I develop the urge to poop, there is a 100% chance it will come out immediately. You are never safe around birds to not poop on you. Which really kind of erases the old thing people used to think about birds targeting their car specifically to poop on from the sky. No bitch. I'm just flying through the sky, and you're hundreds of feet below me, freely available to poop on. What are you going to do? Chase me? I will poop on you, and get away with it. Because I'm a bird."

Then I came back inside, and realized I never thought of a joke, or something random to say here.

Life is funny.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Wow. You've accurately described every one of my posts that you'll never get to read because I just gave up and didn't type it all out.

Fucking cloacas, amiright?

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 2 points 1 week ago

Illuminating.

[–] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago

Based on US history? Yes. Based on the overwhelming majority of experts? Yes. Based on basic economic theory? Also Yes.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It should lead to removal. Tariffs are a congressional power, only.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago

Throw it on the pile.

They gave him emergency tariff powers. Idiots.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

If the US tariffs stand, I think the chance of recession during this year already is near 100%.
So my guess is that the financial analysts are betting that there is a good chance like 50% that these tariffs are removed very quickly. And by very quickly I really mean VERY quickly, like in a matter of a couple of weeks.

The economy in many places around the world is already shifting away from USA. The obvious boycott by Canada and also in Europe by consumers, is only the surface.

To run a company you want stability, and companies all over the world are already seeking alternatives to USA, just as American companies are already seeking alternatives to imports, seeking stability at the cost of profitability, making price increases inevitable either way.

This will stall economic progress, it will create jobs and take away jobs in USA, but the jobs created will be lower wage than the ones that are lost. American production will take over low wage jobs from abroad, and despite the tariffs making competition easier on those jobs, it will not make them high wage jobs.

It will make US trading partners poorer, so they can afford less US imports. And companies are already looking towards ways the highest profit US exports can be replaced. Those are all in services, something not even considered in the moronic US trade deficit calculation. But the area where USA actually has huge surplusses, and at profits often nearing 90%!! Those jobs are at risk now!

All in all it will make both USA and trading partners relatively poorer. But probably USA will be hit the hardest, as the outside world has a more than twice as big trading block than USA has with itself. If that scales linearly, USA will be hit twice as hard by their own tariffs than the rest of the world.

Personally we've stopped buying everything American that we can. And as the one who does most of the shopping, I was actually surprised by the amount of American things we used.

The failing stock market will make it harder to find venture capital, and investments will go down. This too is guaranteed to slow down economic growth.

On a side note, USA has now forced EU to cooperate with China more on trade, something we held back on for security reasons.
But now that security balance has changed dramatically. USA is no longer a more secure partner than China is.
For instance USA is aligning more with Russia now than even China is!!

I don't see how this will not end with a recession for USA maybe already for 2nd and 3rd quarters, which I guess is the soonest possible actual recession (2 quarters of negative growth).

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago

I agree on all counts.

I just can't see how the US could avoid a recession.

A global recession is certainly possible or likely but much less-so.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think the chance of recession during this year already is near 100%.

Year? I'll be surprised if we make MAY without a recession.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I agree, but technically it needs to be 2 quarters in a row to be an official recession.

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 22 points 1 week ago

No ... they will lead to a depression. There is a difference.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

history tells us a possible answer....

that would be American's are FUCKED for a generation if this isn't stopped

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Four Times a Lifetime, to the tune of Three Times a Lady.

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Has "once in a generation" always meant every 20 years?

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Every ten years, now even less.

1990 - Oil Price Shock / End of Cold War, reduction in defense spending

2000 - Dotcom bust

2008 - Housing Market crash

2020 - COVID

2025 - Trump just being a fucking dumbshit who wants to tear down everything other people built

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago

A recession is generally defined as two or more quarters with negative GDP growth.

Tariffs will absolutely cause that. They’re going to dampen US growth for years.

That’s only one simple definition though. Broadly I think the answer is still yes, this will cause US job losses, as you’re already seeing in the automotive industry. Job losses result in lower consumer spending, resulting in lower business revenue, and less business expansion and cost cutting, and it can become a reinforcing cycle.

Recessions can be mild or severe, so the jury is still out on whether the US will hold their tariffs, and how quickly the system adapts to the changes.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 11 points 1 week ago

Literally already has.

[–] Mbourgon@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Betteridge's law of headlines, for once, is wrong.

[–] mmddmm@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

No, they are too late for that.

They could if Trump picked another other to implement his policies.