this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
50 points (79.1% liked)

politics

22813 readers
3351 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Booker’s epic 25-hour speech in the U.S. Senate is a rallying cry for America.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 41 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Considering Booker's recent pro-genocide votes, maybe don't rush to get excited about him.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago

I also love how they refuse to acknowledge the existence of millennials. Being a millennial and watching Gen X pretend like they aren't chasing the financial high of the .com bubble.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

He also got an excop around security while he was carrying gun...

Is unapologetically pro-genocide...

And a whole host of other major issues the Dem voting base don't like.

Booker is not someone who should be leading the party, he's someone who should be getting primaried.

Don't let them tell us we need a conservative candidate, there's zero logic behind that. We need a progressive candidate because that's what will drive Dem turnout.

Edit:

And this article is saying Booker likes hip-hop because he was born in 1969?

Cory Booker is a member of the hip-hop generation. Born in 1969, Booker is a member of the Gen X demographic group who came of age listening to artists such as Public Enemy. These artists did more than simply entertain crowds; they also taught Black history to listeners. Indeed, historian Pero G. Dagbovie notes that Black Americans who were born between 1965 and 1984 seemed to be shaped by social and cultural focuses that were conducive to Black cultural nationalism. The embrace of Black history as a political tool was present in the music – i.e., KRS-One; Queen Latifah, and X-clan. And movies like “Malcolm X” and “Boyz n the Hood” also provided ready access to conversations about racism, the achievements of the Civil Rights Movement, and the continued need to fight racism.

Like, that seems pretty racist on top of being nonsensical....

He's a super rich kid from a very privileged life, he may have listened to some early hip-hop, but so did fucking everyone else regardless of race

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm skeptical about him too.

Re: hip-hop, I think the answer to why he likes it is in the quote itself.

The embrace of Black history as a political tool

It's very possibly genuine, he was in his teens and early twenties as it blew up. But given his record beyond the speech, I think it's reasonable to have doubt.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

His parent were IBM execs and he went to Standford and Yale...

Any connection to hip-hop he had was the same as anyone else in a gated community.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I can still remember when Cory Booker blocked cheaper drug imports from Canada on some bullshit about how they don’t have acceptable safety standards, and I still think of him as the Senator from the pharmaceutical industry. I do not trust him and the physical feat of the filibuster was a superficial one that accomplished absolutely nothing. It was a virtue signaling performance.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

This was my exact reaction too. Supposedly he stopped taking pharmaceutical money but he still takes lots of other corporate money. While I was searching, an AI summary said he was a business friendly progressive which seems like an oxymoron to me.

But whatever. I like performative over submissive.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This headline made me vomit in my mouth.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago

Yeah, more than a little racist. What's next, calling him articulate?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago (2 children)

His ability to stand for over 24 hours is his only good quality.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If only he would use that power for a meaningful filibuster...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

That's how you know it's performative

To filibuster you just need to say "_____ would filibuster this".

Ideally using your own name, or someone else's, but sometimes even saying "someone" will is enough to stop a vote from happening.

It takes virtually no effort to filibuster something meaningful, and instead he did this bullshit and mainstream media all demanded we clap for a neoliberals accomplishing nothing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

The lavish attention and adderall made it his pleasure.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago

Barf. Pretty sure that "good authority" is just a euphemism for liberal fascism.

https://www.blackagendareport.com/cory-bookers-boot-licking-butt-kissing-and-buck-dancing-zionism

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Gen X are just the next boomers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Gen-X went 10 points for Trump in 2024.

Gen-X isn't going to do shit.