this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
84 points (96.7% liked)

World News

45629 readers
2633 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Mr. Xi and his Communist comrades have long believed the West is weak, divided and in retreat. He will see this week as confirmation, and he won’t have to do much to exploit those divisions.

Someone call the burn unit.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Nobody symbolises Western decline more than Trump.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

The amazing part is that he has been the ultimate symbol of Western decline and a personification of the USA's dark Id his entire fucking life and still he somehow got elected twice.

[–] ZeroGravitas@lemm.ee 6 points 5 days ago

But... the swamp...

Proceeds to elect Darth Shreck for a second term.

[–] SarcasticMan@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

"Oh no, why would he do that? Oh golly we can't handle all the new trade deals coming our way, it's so burdensome stop Oh geeze oh golly." - Xi Jinping on his way to the bank

Edit: of to oh

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Xi when he goes to bed at night:
Hehehe I'm winning, and all I have to do, is not to be a total idiot. Playing against Trump is like playing in super easy mode.

[–] perestroika@lemm.ee 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

If your main geopolitical competitor runs headfirst into a brick wall, that is indeed a good day, no doubting.

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Almost like capitalism that isn't constantly propped up is destined to fail.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Capitalism is not really a political system, it's an economic model embraced by basically all political systems except communism.
Almost every country on earth is capitalist in some way to some degree, even most communist systems.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalism

characterized by private property ... wage labor,

All countries have private property and wage labor to some degree.

private ownership of the means of production

This characteristic has only been seriously challenged in communist systems, and while communist systems that do that have failed often, Capitalism remains by far the most successful economic model.

This may change at some point in the future, when work is no longer necessary.
But regulating capitalism according to political desires is the way to go (free market regulation). Currently abandoning capitalism is nothing but a pipedream.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world -5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This is the stupidest article I've read about the tariffs, and that's saying something because I've read some doozies.

The author makes it sound like the US and the rest of the world were building a coalition to take on Chinese control of the global economy, before Trump's tariffs came along and ruined everything. That's horse shit.

The article even mentions Vietnam specifically. Do they not know that Vietnam is also a Marxist-Leninist state? Vietnam has taken many cues from China. Vietnam is trying to become a manufacturing hub, similar to China, and the relationship that Vietnam has been building with the US is one of trade that is similar the relationship the US has with China: they (China/Vietnam) make the stuff, we (the US) buy the stuff.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

That’s horse shit.

No it's not, The US and allies control WTO, and China was only allowed trade on WTO terms after they accepted to follow the WTO standards, basically designed by USA like for instance respecting copyright and patents. Chinese foreign trade was absolutely controlled by the "west", and American politicians have openly stated how they need to prevent China from expanding their influence. Which obviously regards both economy and politics.

Regarding Vietnam I've heard many places that Vietnam absolutely want to remain/increase independence from China, and they worry China has too much power in the region. So the phrase "In Asia, countries such as Vietnam hoped expanding trade with the U.S. would allow them to wriggle out from under Beijing’s thumb." Seems justified to me from what I've heard.

Of course they also want to remain on friendly terms with China, but they probably don't want to be too dependent on a single country.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world -2 points 5 days ago

The US and allies control WTO, and China was only allowed trade on WTO terms after they accepted to follow the WTO standards, basically designed by USA

That means nothing, anymore. Those standards are meaningless, China holds most of cards, now. Any attempts to reign in China have been half hearted at best, and often undermined by the US itself. As tough as people have tried to sound in their rhetoric about China, the fact is American corporations and consumers continue to do business with them because it's just too good of a deal for them.

and American politicians have openly stated how they need to prevent China from expanding their influence.

Well, they have failed, spectacularly, and that was true LONG before even Trump's first term, let alone these tariffs.