this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2025
118 points (99.2% liked)

News

35703 readers
2862 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The order was announced as White House officials believed they were nearing a deal for the app’s operations to be spun off into a new company based in the U.S. and owned and operated by a majority of American investors, with China’s ByteDance maintaining a minority position, according to a person familiar with the matter.

But Beijing hit the brakes on a deal Thursday after Trump announced wide-ranging tariffs around the globe, including against China. ByteDance representatives called the White House to indicate that China would no longer approve the deal until there could be negotiations about trade and tariffs, said the person, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive details of the negotiations.

all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] commander@lemmy.world 42 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No country, no non-American company should capitulate to American demands currently. Let dementia Donald and friends flail for a bunch of hollow victories and have their obituaries become holidays

[–] peregrin5@lemm.ee 13 points 10 months ago
[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And after they had that announcement about how Trump saved them from the law he helped pass. 🤦‍♂️

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

The fact that Trump managed to get the credit both for passing and stopping a law that Biden signed really shows how godawful at politics the modern Democratic party has gotten

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Can we just ban that brainrot spyware app already so I don't have to see it in the news anymore?

Inb4 "hurr durr whatabout muh facebookstagrams?", not a fan of that trash either but it's a different threat.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

You could just stop reading the news if it bothers you so much instead of trying to interfere with other people's first amendment right to rot their brains right out of their own skulls with Chinese propaganda or whatever they want

Also, we should be more scared of our domestic oligarchs and the surveillance and propaganda machines they've been running on the American people

Also also, if TikTok disappears tomorrow, China or their intermediaries can buy whatever data they want from third party data brokers that bundle datasets from a whole variety of businesses and organizations, because we basically don't regulate any of this at all, because Congress doesn't give a shit about our privacy, because it would cost their donors money if they did

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

If we're not going to ban it, we should stop talking about it and move on. If we are going to ban it, we should stop talking about it and do it. We do ourselves no favors by keeping it in the spotlight. It'd probably be tough for a ban to survive a challenge on First Amendment grounds (maybe following the example of Lamont v. Postmaster General, 381 U.S. 301 (1965)) but we live in stupid times so it's not guaranteed.

As for our home-grown (or imported, in certain notable cases) technological Peeping Toms, at least there's a chance that they could be held accountable. It'd rely on people in power actually growing a pair and giving a fraction of a fuck about their constituents so I'm not holding my breath but they're not as out of reach as a Beijing bug factory.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The ban had already been appealed all the way up to the supreme court and held.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Given the current administration, that's not something I'm taking as a rock-solid iron-clad guarantee. Well-paid lawyers can do great and terrible things.