this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
573 points (98.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

10944 readers
2595 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 47 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

And yet somehow I feel this might not be the best path forward.

[–] Patrikvo@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 hours ago

There is one benefit to this. If you're talking to a women at a bar and the people around you starting to move away, you know you're crossing some lines.

[–] Protoknuckles@lemmy.world 61 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Well... let's try it out for a little and see what happens.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Here here !

We can't know until we give it a try

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 38 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Typically without solid training what happens is the weapon gets turned on the wrong person.

But, for the sake of a good time we can imagine some asshole pervs getting lit up like a cigar. Heh heh. Awesome.

[–] unit327@lemmy.zip 12 points 15 hours ago

I hope the QA is good. Training or no training, these aliexpress specials will probably just self immolate in your bag.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 9 points 16 hours ago

Also, fire doesn't just stay put. Yes, you might burn the attacker, but catch the building on fire killing people.

[–] Protoknuckles@lemmy.world 12 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Honestly, I hope it is more deterrent than anything else

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social 9 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Idk, having something that could melt metal from a safe distance as a deterrent seems a bit overkill. But don't take my word for it, I might be overreacting.

[–] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Hmm, that sounds like something a velociraptor would say.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

That’s hate speech.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It's just running on butane - it won't have enough heat mass to melt metal (and produce any notable flames). Probably it won't do much more to a person than startle the hell out of them and maybe ignite their hair.

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

3300°C seems a bit much for butane but it could be farenheit which I would assume is still quite hot.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

I think even oxy-butane tops out at 2,000°C (which is 50,000°F or something idk). 3,300°C is around the max for oxy-acetylene, which is I'm assuming what the person writing this was looking at.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social -5 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Great, create more fear in society and pit people against each other and give them weapons, too. Winning concept.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Pit people against whom? Their active attacker? Who are you worried about making afraid?

[–] bampop@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It's just a weapon. It can be used by anybody, against anybody, for any reason. Being willing to use a weapon against other people doesn't mean you are justified in doing so. This particular weapon is probably most useful for disfiguring people. There's a fair chance that some over-entitled ex-boyfriends and stalkers might find a use for it.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world -2 points 5 hours ago

Do you want to get embarrassed over getting defensive about a dark joke shitpost in a meme sub about women defending themselves against the onslaught of rape the world throws at them and how the systems in power refuse to give a shit about to the point of them requiring lethal disfiguring weapons (as a joke, as this is just a stupid temu lighter intended to be used simply as a lighter for people stupid enough to buy one, if that wasn’t fucking obvious.) to stop it from happening to them or do you maybe just want to fuck off about it? I’ve still got more in the tank, but I’d rather do other things than point out how fucking stupid it is to take shit like this seriously to the point of arguing against it as a safety issue. I just got off of a rare slow shift at work and need to play with my cat.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

What attacker? There is no attacker, it's all a hypothetical situation meant to rile up people like you.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world -2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Rape is a made up hypothetical situation?

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Are you being raped right now?

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, you’re right. You’re so right. I’m not getting raped, so it doesn’t exist. What a relief.

Also, nobody is getting flame throwers, jackass. Congrats on outing yourself as a media illiterate rape advocate because of a meme. Cheers.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yep, people who don't agree with you are rapists. That's a sign of intellectual maturity right there. QED, psycho.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago

Yeah, that’s exactly what’s going on here. Right again. You’re the best kind of guy.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

By that logic, shouldn't everyone carry a gun too? If it's theoretically only going to be used against an active attacker, what's the big deal?

(Note: this isn't an argument for carrying guns)

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of people carry guns specifically for that reason. I’m not saying it’s a perfect solution, but it speaks of a bigger issue that is being ignored. If people are forced to look out for themselves then the options become very limited and outside of the possibility of anything approaching ideal. I’m not choosing to worry about the attackers getting set on fire in this situation, my concerns and those of the people who have a need for things like this have already been outright ignored entirely. People don’t have a better option, it was taken from them already.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

And has easy access to guns never caused problems? Possibly more problems than they've solved?

My problem isn't with people deterring potential attackers or fighting off actual attackers. My concern is with the potential for misuse, and the fact that labeling this as some innocent means of self-defense is covering up the fact that it wouldn't be limited to being used exclusively by victims. That's just marketing. Any psycho could buy one of these.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world -2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Yup. That’s the available option.

Maybe we should try to address the issues with the longstanding preservation of rape culture. When that never happens, though, this is what we are left with. You’re mad at the pen, you should be mad at the person who threw the pen.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You are mad at men, just like racists are mad at immigrants. There is literally no difference in your worldviews, only the targets.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world -2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I’m mad at systemic patriarchy, you’re the one playing the victim and taking that personally. Curious.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

You're mad at a bogeyman, and I don't trust you with weapons, because then I will have to get one too, to protect myself from psychos like you.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world -1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Nobody is getting flame throwers, you fucking moron.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Are you a maga troll? Because this is how they usually argue. None of your arguments make sense when you say this, this is literally the whole fucking debate, about psychopaths like yourself ordering pocket flamethrowers to use against anyone you dislike, which I'm going to confidently guess is everybody but yourself.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Yup, I’m real concerned about the bogeyman. You’re right and you should feel super rational and confident in knowing I’m the obvious victim of false insecurities. You’re doing great, have fun with your mission of fighting against rampant lighter assaults, big fan of that whole thing, but I’m done taking the piss out of you dolts.

[–] Protoknuckles@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Abusers should be afraid. 🤷‍♂️

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

The problem is that who an "abuser" is is extremely subjective. In this case it's evil men. What if people buy these because they're scared of evil immigrants? The argument is the exact same.

And nothing is stopping abusers from getting these too. You think they have a little checkbox on the order you have to cross on the form so they don't accidentally sell them to the wrong person?

And who are they against exactly, gropers, rapists, people that hit on you in a club, any stranger that approaches you? Burning someone alive is a pretty big commitment, you better make sure you got the right person, or else you're just another psychopath with a weapon waiting for a chance to use it on anyone you dislike.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You’re real scared about getting set on fire, huh?

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Spoken like a true klan member.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You understand that nobody is handing out flame throwers, right? You know that this is a meme, right? You can’t really be that fucking stupid, right?

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I see, it's all just a joke and you're frothing at the mouth like a rabid dog because it isn't serious. Right?

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago

Yeah, that’s what’s going on, sure. Keep going, I love you chuds. Point out more about how angry I’m getting about the meme post.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social -1 points 16 hours ago

Handing out weapons to the population and expect them to use them responsibly has worked so fucking well so far...