this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
205 points (99.5% liked)

News

36043 readers
2813 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Is there a reason self hosted paywall bypass tools don’t exist? Is it because these services pay for access?

[–] deceiver@infosec.pub 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At first glance, this does not bypass paywalls. It archives web pages.

People conflate the two services because some of them bypass paywalls as they archive.

I specifically asked for about paywall bypass on purpose.

[–] deceiver@infosec.pub 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

the archiving mechanism itself is what bypasses paywalls. it archives by fetching pages server-side before client-side JavaScript enforces paywalls

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Can this be done in a browser extension? I’m basically wondering why people don’t tell other people about Paywall bypass software on Lemmy. Is it because it sucks? Doesn’t exist?

Such software seems like it would be very Lemmy, and very Linux, and very piracy, and very anarchic. So why am I not already aware of any?

[–] deceiver@infosec.pub 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

it absolutely can! there’s Bypass Paywalls Clean developed by magnolia1234. the reason you don’t see them shared often is that they’re repeatedly taken down from official extension stores like the Chrome Web Store and Firefox Add-ons, and platforms like GitHub, due to legal and political pressure from publishers, which pushes them to increasingly obscure and/or questionable hosting platforms that most normal users wouldn’t touch - case in point, Bypass Paywalls Clean itself is currently hosted on GitFlic, a Russian code hosting platform, as it’s been pushed outside the reach of Western legal frameworks

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

You'd think they would host on codeberg.

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think a subscribed user of the news site has to upload the "unlocked" article to the archive website.

[–] deceiver@infosec.pub 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

no, archive.today (and similar services like the Wayback Machine) work by fetching the page directly through their own servers, essentially acting as a headless browser that renders the page and saves a snapshot. the archive service itself makes the HTTP request, executes JavaScript, and captures the resulting document object model - no subscriber involvement required

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

Ah I see, thanks for the correction!

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

So there is no subscriber at all? How do they get past the wall that requires the payment?

It’s fun how I got a few replies, and none of the answered my very precise question.

[–] deceiver@infosec.pub 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

soft paywalls are enforced by JavaScript running in your browser - the server sends the full article content regardless, and then the JavaScript checks if you’re a subscriber and hides or blocks it if not. when archive.today or a self-hosted tool like ArchiveBox fetches the page, it gets the full content directly from the server before any of that JavaScript enforcement runs. the server doesn’t know or care whether you’re a subscriber, it just responds to the request

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thanks!

I always assumed that wasn’t the case because Paywall bypass extensions are not linked in a reply when someone screams about paywalls in a thread on Reddit or Lemmy. Why is that possible, but not possible with a browser extension?

Are soft paywalls uncommon?

[–] Fiery@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

Soft paywalls only exist on badly made sites (which make up a large part of all sites so it's still more effective than it has any right to be).

Many news sites with paywalls have a proper hard paywall. The only way to get around those is with an account or with an exploit. Neither of those two are going to be published for use in an extension though (as it'd get deactivated very fast).