this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
433 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

81451 readers
4010 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 29 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

Nothing changes for now but other moves by Google clearly show they are trying to kill 3rd party ROMs by locking down Android's code. In my opinion, unless EU steps in and mandates phone manufacturers and Google to support google free apps we're fucked.

[–] lbfgs@programming.dev 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

EU wants phones to be locked down so they can then make Google implement mass surveillance for "national security" reasons

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net -4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

What are you basing this on? If you say "Chat Control" I will just ignore you.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 6 points 58 minutes ago

Chat control is an issue tbough why ignore it?

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

The EU has no interest in allowing privacy on devices, since it is increasingly attempting to control alternative narratives. We're in touching distance of the Fourth Reich now.

[–] Riverside@reddthat.com 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Europe has explicitly no problem with this. They showed they have the power to censor Russian media but refuse to do this with European far-right, they just want the local fascists to win.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Riverside@reddthat.com -1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

Even the premise is too generous:

Why would the leaders of the EU—a project ostensibly built on peace and sovereignty—

How on Earth is the literal cradle of Fascism and colonialism built on peace and sovereignty? The EU is built on neoliberalism and anticommunism, it cannot be built on peace or sovereignty.

[–] mjr@infosec.pub 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Remember that the EU arose in part from the institutions set up to deter the same type of nationalist fascism rising again, such as the ECSC. Sadly, we may have encouraged Russian -funded American -spread international fascism in its place, although they don't seem to control the EU yet.

[–] Riverside@reddthat.com 1 points 56 minutes ago

Fascism is not even Russian funded or American spread, Europe is perfectly capable of growing its own fascism as we saw 100 years ago, sadly we're going down the same road.

[–] MatSeFi@lemmy.liebeleu.de 3 points 3 hours ago

Would not be sure about that. There has been steps in opposite directions in the past. Remember the regulation regarding 3. party app Stores on IOS, or even further back in the past the "Free Brwoser Choice" in MS-Windows.

[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 2 points 3 hours ago

It is surely called competition law?