this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
305 points (99.4% liked)

News

36618 readers
2099 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ukraine recaptured 201 square kilometres (78 square miles) from Russia between Wednesday and Sunday last week, taking advantage of a Starlink shutdown for Russian forces, according to an AFP analysis of data from the Institute for the Study of War (ISW).

The recaptured area is almost equivalent to the Russian gains for the entire month of December and is the most land retaken by Kyiv's forces in such a short period since a June 2023 counter-offensive.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] massacre@lemmy.world 10 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Not trying to distract from your argument, but where are you getting that 325K number? Even on the low estimates, the current 2022 war has at least 400K and potentially well over a million in Russian losses according to the (~800 reference) Wiki Article. Most things I've seen estimate around 1.1-1.2M realistically in losses.

Was this just losses for the portion Ukraine just took back? If so, that seems high?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The 1.2 million number is casualties, including wounded. I just read an article that claimed to have a report of the most recent, most accurate numbers. Unfortunately, I can't find that article right now.

For context, Vietnam cost America 58,000 deaths, and 150,000 to 300,000 injuries, depending on definitions. In any case, after all those years in Vietnam, America's price was a fraction of the cost that the Russians are paying in Ukraine.

[–] massacre@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Fair enough on the casualties vs. deaths. I agree with your message that it's much more of a meat grinder especially how quickly those losses have added up compared to Vietnam.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 4 weeks ago

That's what I'm saying. I remember how freaked out people were about Vietnam, when I was a kid. Russian families have got to be out of their minds. Every day, people probably go to work to hear about how a co-worker's son or husband has been killed or injured.

There's got to be a lot going on over there that we're not hearing about. I highly doubt those people are taking this quietly.