this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2026
757 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

81611 readers
4800 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hacker News.

Just a decade after a global backlash was triggered by Snowden reporting on mass domestic surveillance, the state-corporate dragnet is stronger and more invasive than ever.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] redlemace@lemmy.world 28 points 5 days ago (6 children)

I don't use anything cloud based and much of my shit isn't even allowed out to the internet.

It's a drop in the ocean, for too many say "But it's sooooo convenient and I've got nothing to hide" and open up all they got. Share camera's with amazon, email address book with facebook etc. not realizing nor caring I make an appearance in their instances too and I DO mind.

[–] TWeaK@lemmy.today 24 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I was looking for a new TV last month, the salesman said it was "sacrilege" when I told him I had no intention of connecting the TV to the internet or using its online functions since I will have a media PC connected to it. I was just interested in the quality of the screen.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 17 points 5 days ago

I had to revert the firmware on a TV because it effectively bricked itself when the software was no longer supported. I don’t connect these things to the Internet. They will simply display what I tell them to.

[–] natecox@programming.dev 17 points 5 days ago (4 children)

“I don’t have anything to hide” is such an insidious little lie. A colloquial fib we feel compelled to utter as a mock defense, like asserting innocence will assuage suspicion.

We all have something to hide. Probably many, many things to hide. Even just in the narrow context of the law, there are hundreds of thousands of laws that apply to any one of us at any given time, and you are almost certainly breaking some of them without even knowing it.

Personal security through privacy is so very, very important. I wish more people could see that.

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 10 points 5 days ago (2 children)

In a little town in the Netherlands life was good. The planning committee actually had smart people who made sure to plan the town according to the people’s needs. Kosher butchers, for instance, were placed near Jewish community centers. They could do that because the town had kept records on who lived where, including the people’s religion. It really was a utopia.

Then the nazis invaded, got their hands on those registries, and with utmost efficiency cleared the town of all jews.

I don’t know if this story is true. I read it (probably much better worded) a few years ago. But it honestly doesn’t matter if it’s true.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

But it honestly doesn’t matter if it’s true.

It's plausible and that's enough.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

The point is whether or not it happens, as a parable it's validity is sound. Point is, if even if the current government has nothing but good intentions and would never use the information to do anything you don't agree with, and you are in perfect agreement with the current government. There is always the risk of either the government changing or someone stealing the information from the government that could weaponize it in ways you would never want.

what's crazy to me is the people who defend this type of stuff, are the ones that are also terrified of gun registration... because you know if one day a gun ban were put in place, having a list of where all the guns are would make confiscation easy and legal. But they don't realize that it's just as likely for them to hunt people who spoke out against the government, or were the wrong race.. or hell, just possibly see that you have a gun because you took it home on a ring cam.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

And today Germany still makes you register your religion. You'd think they would have learned....

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 days ago

You can clear your denomination from your file. I don’t know if it survives in a changelog, though.

[–] redlemace@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

“I don’t have anything to hide” is such an insidious little lie

And easy to debunk. Take their phone, ask the pin. 9 out of 10 won't. Open bank app ask pin again. You won't get that far.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 days ago

Every time I hear that I always say the same thing.

It isn't enough that you have nothing to hide.

All that's required is that the general public think they have access to information that someone might want to hide.

Once the public thinks that data can exist or is accessible all that's required is for them to lie or fabricate the required data.

"It would be very unfortunate if there was questionable content 'found' on your phone"

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Let me put things this way:

  • Hands up anybody who doesn't believe that, if they can, Health Insurance companies won't mine the shit out of your purchase data and Car Insurance mine the shit out of your driving data to try and fine tune your risk group in their models and find out any change if your conditions that impact their bottom line (and dump you if they can if you switch to a high risk group)

Even if one's relaxed about data mining of private data for the purpose of serving you custom adverts, there are plenty of other use cases which can actually cost you money, not to mention the risk when the Authorities start running crime-predictive models sold to them by slimy Tech Investors with high enough rates of false positive that you run the risk of being tagged a "Terrorism" for some stupid shit like buying more bleech than the average person.

Even you think you're above board on everything and about as boring and uninteresting a person as possible, there are plenty of ways in which others known everything about you might come around and bit you in the ass in very concrete ways.

[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

When I was a kid in the 90s, there used to small fringe groups talking about global warming and everyone else rolled their eyes. Now when it's too late, people have started caring.

Privacy, security and anonymity are at that place now. Anyone talking about how fucked up it is that even your TV and fridge is mining all the data it can, is considered to be a fringe alarmist. People are going to wait till the world is on fire before taking this seriously. There was an uproar when WhatsApp changed its terms of service a couple of years ago and that died down and nothing changed. The uproar from this (and Discord) will also die down and nothing will change. Maybe one day people will see this as relevant to their lives and take it seriously.

[–] big_slap@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (2 children)

people that tell me "they have nothing to hide" understand where I am coming from in terms of privacy when I ask them to write down their social security number on a piece of paper with their debit/credit card information

[–] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

If you have nothing to hide, would you please consider installing 4K cameras in every corner of your house that publicly livestream your every action and also remove your front door?

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Assume either Trump will go after anybody saying anything critical about him and the party, or imagine AOC takes over the government and going after anybody saying something positive about Trump. Without privacy, you're f-ed either way.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

imagine AOC takes over the government and going after anybody saying something positive about Trump.

Yeah that’s not gonna happen. I get what you mean, but she’s not some despotic arch-trump.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 3 points 4 days ago

Only in Fox news reality, I know

[–] LMurch@thelemmy.club 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It may seem like a drop in the ocean now, but if things ever got to the point where we're being divided up into groups, you might be oddly left out of every group. It's not hard to de-Google, de-Meta, inconvenient at times, but maybe it pays dividends down the road.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The trouble with living in a panopticon is that becomes suspicious to not be on a list.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 days ago

We're already seeing that where people are suspicious when you don't have Facebook or whatever.

[–] redlemace@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Recent tv's became thin client's. Turn it on and it first need to download the app('s)