this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
1043 points (98.8% liked)

Science Memes

18982 readers
1089 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] atcorebcor@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’m thinking more in terms of warfare

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

how so?

The technology to use fusion as a bomb already exists. and has 0 to do with how the reactors work

[–] atcorebcor@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

For example when Russia invaded Ukraine and they attacked Chernobyl. Maybe it’s not founded in real risk. But I imagine it could be a security threat for someone to bomb a nuclear facility.

[–] Techlos@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

To alleviate your concerns - unlike fission, in a fusion reactor the only radiation comes from the active fusion process, and chamber lining that's been bombarded by radiation. The worst case is a brief spike of neutron and gamma radiation from where the chamber breaches before the plasma collapses, a small amount of short-lived radioisotopes from the chamber debris, and a bit of tritium.

The radiation from the debris would be at background levels in a year or two, since there's no transuranic decay chains (once decay event, and it's stable again). The tritium would disperse to background levels in minutes, and the radiation burst would only be a hazard in the immediate vicinity.

Not free from issues at all, but compared to a fission reactor the worst-case scenario isn't bad at all.

[–] atcorebcor@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Great, and I also hear that the amount of nuclear waste is tiny in comparison to contemporary nuclear reactors.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A fusion power plant will not explode in any meaningful way

[–] atcorebcor@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Alright, the more you know