this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2026
894 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

80267 readers
3870 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

This huge problem stems from "we need". Collectivism leads to hierarchy, because a collective isn't semantically compatible to one person. A collective can't be responsible, a collective can't make a decision, a collective can't think, a collective can't speak in one voice. But collectivism means trying to treat a collective like one person. Leading to dictatorships.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Finally, someone had to say it. While capitalism is far from perfect, I'd rather have billionaire capitalist assholes that I can then call on their bullshit than so-called 'socialism' which is just the pretty way to call a dictatorship. Show me one 'socialist' country that has thrived. One, come on.

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 hours ago

OK, I can name one. It's Israel. Before 90s it was (administratively, politically, socially) socialist (not like marxist, but with collectives and communes and kibbutz, and much of economy being state monopolies). One reason after 90s everything changed about it was because there were certain reforms which, eh, significantly raised level of life, making all the old institutions unpopular. So it's no more socialist in anything.

A-and, of course, the part about collectivism was present. Some things I've heard about Israel before 90s emotionally reminisce USSR. Sort of a procrustean bed of a society, if you don't fit it's your problem.

[–] TheBlackLounge@lemmy.zip 7 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

You talk as if with corporations a single person can be held responsible...

You can have syndicates and get close to socialism

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 hours ago

Show me where.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 12 hours ago

Thats then syndicalism which is a form of socialism

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

shit, the average public corporation is a more representative democracy than the US's actual government is.

[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I had to scroll back up to make sure I was stilling the same thread

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

average US corpo is just 1 vote 1 share, just right there it's more equal representation than the US government has been for it's entire existence.

throw in shit like recalling/installing new c-suites etc.

far more responsive/equal form of government than the clown show that is US "democracy"