this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
159 points (93.4% liked)

Games

45371 readers
1177 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 24 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Valve got to where they are by simply being the option that offered the most convenience to end users.

All the things this lawsuit is challenging are true. Valve does have a defacto monopoly on PC games distribution, they do not let you buy DLC on other platforms for games you own on steam, and they do take a 30% cut of sales.

Having these be limited by government regulation is a good thing. It would increase interoperability and increase competition in the space.

If those things get changed, people will still continue to use Steam because they continue to offer a service that "just works". Every other storefront that has attempted to compete seems to either trip over itself by trying some anti-consumer behavior to increase short term profit(EGS, Uplay), lack discoverability features(itch), or not offer enough benefit to endure cost of change(GoG)

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 21 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

I'll be that guy and say that I do prefer buying from GOG, going as far as paying more money in doing so, so the issue isn't really 'friction' but 'mfs don't bother offering on GOG'.

My hate for drm has only grown over the last two decades, and so I'll get stuff wherever I can that isn't plastered with it. But it's not even a rounding error in comparing the number of games available of steam vs GOG. You'd have to go so far out with zeros that you fall off the page before encountering a positive value (0.00000[...]00001%). Which is upsetting and frustrating, since the other option is steam or piracy. And I do like rewarding developers for their work, so that leaves one option basically all the time.

[–] phx@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

Indeed, and now what GoG is pursuing stronger Linux offerings I may shop there more, but Valve had contributed more than just a shop and launcher. The Linux work with Steam Deck and Proton has been invaluable.

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

There are games on Steam that don't have DRM (since it's not a requirement from Valve). The most prominent examples I can think of are games from Toby Fox and Klei Entertainment.

[–] Infrapink@thebrainbin.org 2 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Steam is a DRM system.

I am not being flippant or facetious. Steam is literally a DRM system with a shop grafted on top. That is what it has always been. If a game is on Steam, it be definition has DRM.

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 19 minutes ago

Steam is a distribution platform, with DRM provided as an optional feature for the developer. If I wanted to play Deltarune without using the steam launcher, I can go to the downloaded directory and simply launch the executable. For convenience's sake, most users will use the steam client to launch their games, and some games force you to due to developer choice. In order to play the game I wanted to play though (Deltarune), steam only served as a storefront and a download repository.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 hours ago

But for the games without DRM you can just download them and run the executable. Bypassing Steam

Sure, if you stop using steam you can't re-download or update the game, but if the game didn't have DRM, you can just keep copying the existing executable

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago

I'd love to see this as an official tag on the store page.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

In terms of straight numbers, isn't Steam's large "advantage" there it's offering of independent, mostly unregulated games from small time devs? Are those really using drm? Even if there are, I don't really think most users are choosing Steam over GOG for access to "Asset Flip #57354".

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I thought the small indie devs were mostly on itch?

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 4 points 13 hours ago

Itch is exclusively indie devs, afaik, but since Steam started their Greenlight initiative, the number of games released per year has rocketed up. 2012, the year Greenlight started, only 441 games were released on steam. Two years later in 2014, almost 1500 games were released. 2017 released 5600. 2021 released 10,200. And last year had over 21k. How much of that do we think is really DRM'd, AAA published software?

[–] PlzGivHugs@sh.itjust.works 10 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (3 children)

Every other storefront that has attempted to compete seems to either trip over itself by trying some anti-consumer behavior to increase short term profit(EGS, Uplay), lack discoverability features(itch), or not offer enough benefit to endure cost of change(GoG)

I'd argue that GoG also falls into the lack of discovery catagory.

That said, I'd argue that the lack of discovery isn't just a player issue, but ties back into the other side: publishers and devs. These storefronts/launchers are unessisary middle men. A software company can run its own store, and make its own launcher. Just look at so many of the big titles over the last two decades: Minecraft, League, Tarkov, War Thunder, Roblox, and more recently Hytale. Looking at players is only half the puzzle, the other half is how these storefronts compete against each other, and even against direct-to-customer sales for publishers.

So, for publishers/devs, what does Steam offer?

  • Payment processing
  • Distribution
  • A very robust support system
  • Discoverability
  • Tools for online play and social features
  • Lightweight DRM for those who want it
  • Modding tools
  • A community forum
  • Tools to add compatibility to your games
  • A plethora of extra features that improve your product for the players

And at what cost?

  • 30% cut
  • Tied to a forum, whether you want to be or not

Now to compare to, lets say, GOG:

Offers:

  • Payment processing
  • Distribution
  • Some user support

Costs:

  • 30% cut
  • DRM is banned

Because of this, its no wonder that they can't get more of the market. Why would someone choose to sell there over Steam, or even over direct-to-consumer?

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

You left off the newer steam deck which opens your games up to a mobile audience.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Just to be clear, distributing on Steam adds nothing functional to a game's playability on the Steam Deck (afaik). A game from GOG can be played in a Deck just as well as one from Steam, albeit with slightly more effort.

That said, I know customers will flow toward the path of least resistance, so even a little more effort will push them towards a different source.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

albeit with slightly more effort.

customers will flow toward the path of least resistance

I think that's the crux of it. It can be done, but I would bet the vast majority are just playing steam games on SteamOS

So if you launch on Steam, you can reach PC users and Mobile users, and someone might decide to buy the game on steam knowing it will work easily on both.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

A software company can run its own store, and make its own launcher. Just look at so many of the big titles over the last two decades: Minecraft, League, Tarkov, War Thunder, Roblox, and more recently Hytale.

This is also survivorship and selection bias though. Not only would you not have heard of the ones that failed, but these are the games confident enough to not launch on Steam in the first place. Several of them are so old that Steam was in its infancy and not the de facto storefront when they came out.

[–] ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Steam was the defacto storefront when all those games came out.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

In 2005 when Roblox came out? No. League of Legends came out in 2009, and I had barely started shopping on Steam for non-Valve games back then. Most of us were still buying games on disc at Walmart. Minecraft was doing early access before Steam had the feature.

[–] PlzGivHugs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago

My point is that it is an option, and still a competitive one, when so many still use this option. If it wasn't, these games wouldn't have succeeded and/or would have died off. Its an option middlemen have to out-compete, and I'd argue many don't.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 1 points 15 hours ago

~~unessisary~~ unecessary

Just a little correction.