533
Epstein files update: Bill Gates got STD from ‘Russian girls’; ex-wife Melinda, Musk in latest release
(www.hindustantimes.com)
this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
533 points (97.2% liked)
You Should Know
43611 readers
1485 users here now
YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.
All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.
Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:
**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.
If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.
Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.
Rule 11- Posts must actually be true: Disiniformation, trolling, and being misleading will not be tolerated. Repeated or egregious attempts will earn you a ban. This also applies to filing reports: If you continually file false reports YOU WILL BE BANNED! We can see who reports what, and shenanigans will not be tolerated. We are not here to ban people who said something you don't like.
If you file a report, include what specific rule is being violated and how.
Partnered Communities:
You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.
Community Moderation
For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.
Credits
Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
So you're saying, that if a woman of sound mind and body, chooses to consent to having sex with a billionaire for money that it's still wrong because the billionaire has more money and power.
Even though she could say no? Even if it was of her own volition, that it's still wrong?
To me it sounds like you are assuming that women can't make their own choices.
In a perfectly balanced, evenly powered world where everyone had adequate housing, food, and all the necessities of life, transactional sex is fine. Because no one's life depends on it. There is no power imbalance, no coersion.
But we don't live in that world. Billionaires can and often do make your life a living hell if they don't get what they want from you. And people, generally, do not have all the necessities of life. 99+% of them require money to live. And these women are no exception. Heck, this doesn't apply to even just billionaires or men. Sex workers NEED that money to live, so it is inherently exploitative.
That is the problem, like it or not. But billionaires only compound the issue multiple times over, because they can also apply power greater than others. And they can stop being a billionaire at any point.
Oh
i have similar thoughts and to me it's really just about the balance of power. It could just as easily be a billionaire woman and a working man. I think in any kind of relationship (the broad term, not the dating term) each person needs to be accountable to each other. Good outcomes can still happen when somebody is unaccountable, but there is massive risk. And I go by the motto that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. If somebody has a lot of power, they will use it for evil. One goal of society should be to make that impossible.
Transactional sex is not a relationship
Hell, let's take that line of reasoning a bit further
On average, men are significantly stronger than women so there's a power imbalance there too. That would mean that on average, heterosexual relationships are non-consensual
This is what Dworkin essentially argues in Intercourse. Which Rush Limbaugh read as “all sex is rape.”
just so you know, you're the reason why #MeToo was necessary
You took a hard left there. Consensual transactional sex is rape? Is that what you're saying? I think you are totally lost on this conversation.
a lot of them did say no years after the fact but I have a feeling you're the type of person who wouldn't understand that consent works like this
Uh... So it became sexual abuse several years after it happened?
If that's the case I think people should stop having sex altogether. And relationships in general. Hell, there's been times where I've regretted intercourse later on too, but never have I thought about it as being rape after the fact.
The issue with revoking consent after the fact is that you can literally just make anyone a rapist that way. Hell you can do it on purpose if you want to. Pretend to consent and then later say you decided it wasn't consensual at all.
In the case of the #MeToo movement you mentioned in another comment, there was usually an explicit or implicit tit-for-tat. I.e "you aren't getting this role unless you sleep with me" that affected a person's career. That itself makes consent invalid IMO because it's coerced. But if you decide to have sex with a billionaire for money - well, there was going to be no negative effect to not doing it. You can live on without that money. Weinstein (and many others like him, I'm sure) acted as a gatekeeper to something rare, movie roles. Money is plentiful in this world and there's other ways to get it.
We're not talking about reality here. I was making a point that prostitution shouldn't be unethical or illegal when consensual.