this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2026
1223 points (99.6% liked)

politics

27872 readers
2743 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The footage of the fatal shooting of Alex Jeffrey Pretti, said one journalist, “shows that the final act of his life was trying to help a woman who was being physically assaulted by the masked agents who would then kill him.”

In the original video of the shooting of a man in Minneapolis, identified by the Minneapolis Star Tribune at 37-year-old Alex Jeffrey Pretti, a woman in a pink coat was seen in the background filming the incident with her phone. 

Drop Site News obtained footage that appeared "to come from the direction of the woman in pink filming from the sidewalk" and showed the shooting at a closer distance than the footage taken from inside Glam Doll Donuts. 

In the video, the shooting victim, dressed in a brown coat and pants, is seen filming a federal agent with his phone. He's then seen guiding another person toward the sidewalk as the agent forcefully shoves a third person to the ground.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ChonkyLincoln@lemmy.zip 87 points 1 week ago (4 children)

ICE murdered that man.

From here we have two paths:

One: Civility is eventually restored to government and these people are tried and convicted for their crimes.

Two: All out civil war.

We will not let ICE, Trump or any of these Nazis complete their agenda.

[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago (3 children)

There's a third option: people don't resist and the regime does whatever it wants.

So far we've chosen that option.

[–] KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The third option is what I expect from years of "American exceptionalism" brainwashing.

[–] Mr_WorldlyWiseman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ironically that's how things went so wrong in Russia, too.

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Germany too. Dont Be A Sucker should be alll over social media

[–] MashedHobbits@lemy.lol 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I expect them to act smug and talk about the midterms.

[–] MortUS@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

100% - You're suggesting to fight the U.S. Military in power. History has shown that nobody "wins" against the American Military. (inb4 some obscure factoid). Even in Vietnam or Afghanistan, it was just destruction - nobody won anything except the investors.

There's 0 leadership down in the trenches too. So ontop of suggesting to fight the U.S. Military, you're suggesting to do so as unorganized. That's going to be easily spun by media as terrorist cells. Sure, they're throwing around "domestic terrorist" already, but it hits differently when they only see 1 side dying. Once there are actual gunfights in the street is when they can rally support from their base for actual action.

We have to wait for midterms. There's been so much bad press regarding Trumps 2nd term that regaining control of the Senate is doable, albeit difficult. In the chance that the Senate is held, then there's a chance to restore order and bring people to justice. Midterms is going to be impossible to avoid for those who participate so it's going to be impossible to avoid the onslaught of bullshit that ensues and will be a wake up call for the people not on Lemmy (or Reddit) and still on Facebook or X (Boomers).

Personally, I think a Civil War in inevitable. I don't think the Trump Admins are going to recede power. I don't think Dems are going to get a majority in the Senate, and I think things are going to get worse. That being said, Midterms is a chance to find leadership and a chance for actual States to break out of this charade.

[–] French75@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 week ago

That’s going to be easily spun by media as terrorist cells.

And the "terrorist" label might also be pretext for the government to de-bank the people they accuse.

[–] llacook@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I want to believe that the killing of Good and Pretti will be a turning point…but I’m a middle aged American who has developed some cynicism about my fellow countrymen…

[–] bassow@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Ah, the good ol' "Why are they not doing anything about this".

[–] French75@slrpnk.net 29 points 1 week ago

One: Civility is eventually restored to government and these people are tried and convicted for their crimes.

Respectfully, that's an outcome, not a path to get there.

The MAGA shitheads won't just give up and let themselves be prosecuted. They won't stop appointing judges, they won't stop cheating on elections, they won't stop manipulating media, and they won't stop harassing, intimidating, and killing their opposition until someone makes them.

[–] CptEnder@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Military coup. The only way a civil war is successful is if the military are on the side of the people. The most important of which would be the USN and USAF Strategic Forces. A prolonged ground war is only won by sea, air, and nuclear forces. More specifically nuclear forces in the hands of said military who will NOT use them on our own land.

It will present a serious challenge with all the Pentagon purges. But the majority of Flag and Line officers are from West Point, Annapolis, and Maxwell. It's unlikely most side with Trump (for now). The real trick will hinge on the NCOs, as the US Military is predominantly a middle-out force, and senior NCOs hold the bulk of our service members' respect. What they decide to do in the majority will dictate the outcome of a civil war. One NG commander already stated publicly he will order his soldiers to protect protesters from ICE agents. There is a small chance.

Ideally the next time President Trump boards Marine 1 he's taken into custody at a military base with a large Delta, Rangers, or NG presence to subdue USSS agents. With a Federal Judge, Vance, Speaker Johnson, and Grassley in tow. Invoke 25 or Martial Law, and go down the line of succession until someone takes the oath. This is highly unlikely though. A full impeachment is more likely, but a lot of people will need to for die before it will happen.

It's either that or The Man in The High Castle. The American Fourth Reich.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's uhhh, not how that works. You can't hold ground with bombs and missiles. And the Army is absolutely capable of holding ground against bombs and missiles. Nukes are, obviously, another story.

[–] CptEnder@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Naw you're right, but I only meant that the most critical parts of our military we would need on our side are USN/USAF. While you are correct the US Army would be the most ideal force to hold land, this task could also be completed by NG or insurgency BLUFOR. But yeah obviously the Army would be more successful and have more ass like AH-64s, MBTs, and IFVs and professional soldiers trained in occupation.

But you cannot secure additional land and project force without sea and air superiority. I'd also add USAF's Cyber Command authority as well (I'm not sure if USSF has fully adopted this role yet). I'm also not sure which branch is doing the most work in drone tech, but I'd imagine it would have to be either USAF or USN as we've seen in Ukraine, this will also be a major factor in modern, mechanized warfare.

And yeah you're also correct, ultimately none of this matters if our Strategic Forces are in the wrong hands. Nuclear remains the "nuclear" option.

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Civility is eventually restored to government and these people are tried and convicted for their crimes.

For that you need some power. Effectively in other countries like Ukraine, the economic nobility (i.e billionaires) comes to the rescue. The problem is that it seems that the economic nobility has built a golem they no longer control but are doubling down on controlling it.

Two: All out civil war.

In this case you also need some power backing it. Unless you are Cuba or some shithole like the Russian Empire in 1917.


My marvel influenced child, the only way the society pushes back with these cards is internal sabotage.

[–] ChonkyLincoln@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Internal sabotage you say?

I’d like to subscribe to your news letter, sir. Count me in

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=meIsGj02qGw&pp=ygUic2ltcHNvbnMgaSB3b3VsZCBsaWtlIHRvIHN1YnNjcmliZQ%3D%3D