this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2026
269 points (96.9% liked)

News

34281 readers
2039 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is this satire? That is a wildly optimistic take, if not. Wildly.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This person has single handedly taken on the task of white washing the DNC on lemmy. They've been posting stuff like this for months.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, you really have to follow details of politics to understand what he's talking about, and not just headlines on Lemmy.

The effect of the DNC rule changes or the effect the head of the DNC head are not things that are covered here.

How arrogant to claim that i only know of things written in headlines and posted to Lemmy, while completely failing to elaborate on even a single point mentioned. Please enlighten us with actual examples of this "new" DNC in action.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I actually believe him, and I'll tell you why:

Because before the leadership change, he was one of the most distinctly anti-DNC posters I remember interacting with. He was so incredibly critical of the Democrats it was easy to mistake him for one of those MAGA/tankie trolls trying to discourage people from voting (that was never actually his message, but it was easy to misinterpret it as such).

Point is, IMO he has street cred against being a "vote blue no matter who" type.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Can you explain how that makes you believe him? I recall the same thing as someone who is also highly critical of the DNC after what they've done this past decade and I have yet to see anything signaling change from them that would warrant even the smallest belief in what they say.

They recently blocked the release of the "autopsy report" of the 2024 election:

Despite a pledge from DNC Chair Ken Martin to release the post-election report, the committee announced Thursday it would not share it publicly.

The DNC wanted to avoid another public debate over how the party lost the White House to Donald Trump, and instead, turn its focus on its recent successes (such as?), according to this official.

“In our conversations with stakeholders from across the Democratic ecosystem, we are aligned on what’s important, and that’s learning from the past and winning the future,” Martin continued. “Here’s our North Star: does this help us win? If the answer is no, it’s a distraction from the core mission.”

So apparently Martin was either lying or isn't wielding unchecked power like that person claims. Furthermore, Martin is stating that the party only cares about winning and anything that doesnt help them win is simply a "distraction." This means if the DNC feels its more popular to have ICE round up and throw immigrants into concentration camps, they'll do it. If they think more tax cuts for the 1% is popular, they'll do it. They're abandoning all pretenses of ideology in favor of populism. They're not interested in solving problems, but rather winning by telling people what they want to hear. These are their real statements and actions. That user is trying to sell you a bill of goods of more future promises with nothing to back it up.

To me this just reinforces my view of them being little more than patsies and controlled opposition for the Republican party. They only exist to legitimize a completely broken one-party system of the ruling elite while we're treated as little more than cattle.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/12/18/dnc-kills-its-own-public-2024-autopsy-00697403

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Okay, let me rephrase that: I believe that he believes what he's saying -- I don't think he's trying to "whitewash" the DNC (i.e. I don't think he has an ulterior motive), as your previous comment accused him of. Whether he's actually correct in his assessment might be another matter, but I believe he is expressing it in good faith.


Also, responding to this part separately:

Furthermore, Martin is stating that the party only cares about winning and anything that doesnt help them win is simply a “distraction.” This means if the DNC feels its more popular to have ICE round up and throw immigrants into concentration camps, they’ll do it. If they think more tax cuts for the 1% is popular, they’ll do it. They’re abandoning all pretenses of ideology in favor of populism. They’re not interested in solving problems, but rather winning by telling people what they want to hear.

I think you've got some misconceptions and false assumptions going on here:

  1. "Populism" (i.e. listening to the majority, which is the working class) isn't a bad thing. Bernie Sanders and AOC are "populist." The word with a negative connotation that you're looking for is "demagogue" -- that's what Trump is.

  2. Your speculation about them deciding to support fascist shit is fearmongering. In reality, that's incredibly unpopular amongst the actual people (as opposed to extremists amplified by sympathetic media) and I don't think they're that stupid that they'd support it by mistake. If anything, moving to "populism" means moving away from that.

  3. The DNC's problem up to this point has been exactly the opposite: refusing to do what their voters want and instead catering to what their rich donors want. Frankly, Martin claiming that they want to win (instead of being controlled opposition while raking in corporate donor graft) is the best fucking news I've heard in a while.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ken Martin was the best choice of the short list for chair of the DNC. We will see what his leadership brings.

Ken Martin was the best choice of the short list for chair of the DNC.

Sounds like a roundabout way of calling him the "lesser evil." Sounds like the same old party to me.