this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
1353 points (99.5% liked)

News

34172 readers
2882 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“It is a sign that people aren’t happy within the U.S. government, clearly. The shooting [of Good] was the last straw for many people," Dominick Skinner, ICE list founder, told The Beast.

Information included in the new leak includes around "1,800 on-the-ground agents and 150 supervisors. Early analysis by the organization suggests that around 80 per cent of the staff identified remain employed by DHS," according to The Beast.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cynar@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Even as law enforcement, they have a level of rights to privacy, just like the rest of us. That is why badge numbers are used. They unambiguously identify them, without also spreading who their siblings are, and where their children go to school.

The lack of ANY identifying features for ICE "agents" is VERY telling.

[–] smh@slrpnk.net 37 points 2 days ago

I'm a public (state) employee. My name, title, and salary are posted publicly. I don't see why ICE agents shouldn't enjoy that same level of transparency.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

They do not have a right to privacy while they are on duty.

And there is no "right to privacy" in the USA for anyone.

[–] OshagHennessey@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

On paper, there is a right to privacy in the US in places where a reasonable person would have an expectation to privacy, which is codified into law.

The only place where everyone has an expectation to privacy (barring exigent circumstances) is bathrooms (porta-potties included), changing rooms, locker rooms, or anywhere else where people are expected to use the bathroom or change clothes.

There is an expectation to privacy for individuals on their own private property. I can spy on you in my house, but you can't spy on me in my house (peeping through someone's windows is a crime but me having a hidden camera in my living room is not).

However, when it comes to public officials conducting duties of their office, there is no expectation of privacy, even on their private property (though, due to the conflict of interest, this is unlikely to happen).

The only place where no one has any expectation to privacy is public property (like a park, post office, library, city bus, etc.) and private property which is open to the public (most businesses, malls, etc.).

In practice, you can't fart or jerk off without a corporation knowing about it.

[–] swab148@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

In practice, you can't fart or jerk off without a corporation knowing about it.

I make sure they know about it!

On paper, there is a right to privacy in the US in places where a reasonable person would have an expectation to privacy, which is codified into law.

i'm unfamiliar with this

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

F*** that. I'm a professor to public institution. My name salary and virtually everything else has to be public information.

These assholes should be required to be a lot more transparent than I am. I don't get to beat anybody and ship them off to a third world hellhole prison.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm a major one for transparency. I will accept that a police or justice officer doing their job properly and reasonably, can still make enemies. A certain level of information security, of their private lives, is then reasonable to keep them and their families safe.

Their job life should be documented well however. If their body cam is not working, it should be assumed to hide something, until proven otherwise.

I also don't see the US's ICE as police or justice. They have shown none of the restraint and control expected of the role. They are armed thugs, with a powerful backer, and should be treated as such.

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think you're 100% off base. We need as much transparency as humanly possible. You only see ice as a problem because it's a problem for you.

I know what a lot of black folks that are terrified of getting stopped by the police under any circumstances. Your categorizing them differently and for good reason but it's wildly misguided.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

FYI, I'm not American, I'm watching from the outside.

The UK police, while they have their issues, are a lot better than American police. A lot of them also love the bodycams. They make their job a LOT easier, with far less hassle.

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Our police are considerably more dangerous than yours. And all they have to do is turn off their body cams.

Unfortunately we live in completely different realities. I believe your cops are actually trained.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I mainly meant it as a goal to aim for. Police don't have to be brutish idiots.

Our police use a "police by consent" mindset, rather than a "police by force" one. Most don't even carry guns.

It certainly is, but it's not the reality we live in currently. And there are so many boot lickers that we may never get there. Anytime you say something about military spending or police spending they just seem to ratchet it up in response.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Citation missing.

Basic records of public employment in government are not invasions of privacy. FOIA applies.