this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
499 points (97.7% liked)

News

34143 readers
3483 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BeanGoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 173 points 1 day ago (7 children)

“Next, many of my Christian friends have asked me to find Jesus before I go. I’m not a believer, but I have to admit the risk-reward calculation for doing so looks so attractive to me, so here I go. I accept Jesus Christ as my Lord and Savior and look forward to spending an eternity with Him. The part of me not being a believer should be quickly resolved if I wake up in heaven. I won’t need any more convincing than that. I hope I’m still qualified for entry.”

What an absolute fucking goober. Good luck with that one, chief.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 129 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

That's Pascal's wager, and it's nothing new.

There's plenty more about him that can be criticized.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 43 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Pascal's Wager is hilarious because it implies that their "omniscient" God is so stupid he can be tricked into thinking you sincerely believe. Sounds blasphemous to me!

[–] RustyShackleford@programming.dev 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

I thank god everyday that I was made to be an atheist.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's why this guy is better known for his contributions to computer science

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 1 points 6 hours ago

writeln readln

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I suppose it depends on if you think faith is inherently important or it's just the behavior.

I mean his paragraph is pretty much outright silly, but broadly you can decide that acting "right" might happen to help you in an afterlife scenario. Some specifics prescribed by religion are kind of arbitrary, but there's some common things about trying to be good to others.v Going MAGA like he did would seem to be a perilous move in that context.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How about the fact he used his status as a conservative voice to skip the line and get priority experimental cancer treatments? Not only did he die, but somewhere out there there is another person dead or dying because they got bumped from the treatment

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago

I prefer the one where he was such a shitty father that he mused about not having to murder his own teenaged son after he ODed

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Things are "experimental" because we don't know if they work, not because they are better.

[–] hume_lemmy@lemmy.ca 2 points 22 hours ago

Yeah, it could be that his final, worthwhile contribution to humanity was to be a line on a spreadsheet.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I refuse to believe the pantheons of gods didn't predict pascal's wager and hide an antipascal clause similar to Matthew 25:31 where not being an asshole will send you to heaven and being an asshole sends you to hell.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Don't believe in God, until you're standing at the pearly gates. St Peter hates this one weird trick

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

You know that Jesus allegedly has said many times that not believing in God is the sinnest of sins? Down to hell with you, then.

[–] SirActionSack@aussie.zone 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

To be fair, that's a very Southern Baptist way to look at it. If you've ever read a Chick Tract (I'm so sorry), you'll know that many end with someone who lived mired in sin earnestly repenting and believing in God right before they die, and it's shown to work. Some other branches of Christianity, notably Catholicism, relax the emphasis on belief and put more stock into your actions while you lived – although they also believe most but not all sins can be pardoned if you confess and perform penance.

However, I would suggest that believing in God because of Pascal's wager is:

  1. Obviously idiotic (this part we all know). There are an infinite amount of gods you could believe in that would have the belief requirement. Even if you assert that it's a belief in "a" god, how are we supposed to know it wouldn't be some god who values empirical reason and would look down on this belief? These infinitesimal odds you're wasting your only known life on aren't even strictly positive.

  2. Something the God of the Bible probably wouldn't appreciate? Within the shared fiction of Christianity, he knows exactly what's in your heart, and I'm sure "I'm cooperating just so you give me the goods" doesn't play well. Granted that's kind of on God for being an abusive parent and threatening eternal damnation to anyone who doesn't, but I'm still sure he doesn't like people who game his abusive system for selfish ends.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I fucking love Chick Tracts and collect them. They are so wildly unhinged it's great

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Seconding that Chick Tracts are comedy gold (Exhibit A). They're so feverishly deranged that they become an unintentional parody of evangelical Christianity. Solidly "so bad it's good".

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They used to get left in the bathrooms on Washington State Ferries pretty reliably and I got together a pretty good collection. The first one I read was the classic Dungeons and Dragons one, this would have been pretty close to its first publication too. I wish I had kept those.

[–] smh@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago

I used to get them as a kid, trick or treating. I kind of miss them in a messed-up nostalgia way.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

There was a table in the NYC subway many years ago that had thousands of them and they were handing them out. I definitely took a couple, knowing full well what they are, for the sheer novelty.

Also to give them a few less to hand out to someone who might be susceptible because fuck em

I was hoping to find and share an image macro of Leela and Nibbler discussing the meaning of life, with Leela remarking, "So every religion is wrong!"

Unfortunately, all I could find is Leela/Nibbler porn. Lots and lots of it. Goddamn, humans. We should be lucky there's no judgemental god watching us all.

[–] BenVimes@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"The vilest offender who truly believes, that moment from Jesus a pardon receives," so goes the old hymn.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 1 points 1 day ago
[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

That’s Pascal’s Wager, taken to the logical conclusion. Pascal’s Wager is basically the idea that debating whether or not God exists is meaningless; If you simply live life as if God does exist, then there are no downsides. Just be someone who God would want in heaven, and the actual belief doesn’t really matter.

But then when you take that to a logical conclusion, it basically turns into “there’s no downside if I’m wrong, and repenting on my deathbed means all my previous sins are forgiven. So why not repent right before dying, so my previous sins are forgiven and I’m dying with a clean slate?”

Different denominations have different opinions on it. Baptists tend to take the “fire and brimstone unless you repent, but you’re all golden after repentance” stance. So they would tend to agree with this scenario. This is also why southern baptists tend to be such cunts, because they tell themselves that their actions are righteous and backed by God, because they have repented. Basically, justifying evil is easy when you change the question from “is this morally evil” to “is this backed by my god?”

Catholics used to have a very hard “baptism washes away (almost) all sins” stance, but have recently adopted a more fluid “how you act in life is just as important as what you believe” stance. So older Catholics would have likely agreed, but modern Catholics would tend to disagree.

The more liberal denominations (like United Methodists) would scoff and say that faith without works is dead.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

debating whether or not God exists is meaningless; If you simply live life as if God does exist, then there are no downsides. Just be someone who God would want in heaven

Not what Pascal's wager is, afaik.

Jesus says many times that not believing in God is the ultimate sin. Thus, if you don't sincerely believe that God exists, you're fucked. Ergo, Pascal's wager is believing that God exists regardless of your actual attitude toward religion.

Which is why I said it is taken to the extreme logical conclusion. Many denominations believe that baptism and/or repentance is enough to wash away and forgive previous sins. After all, that was Jesus’ whole thing. So why bother believing for the majority of your life, when you can simply accept God on your deathbed? No need to believe your entire life, when believing right at the end is enough.

[–] imsufferableninja@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If he's a pascal's wager guy, I hope he died in battle just in case the Norse are correct. And his deeds in life kept his heart lighter than a feather, in case the Egyptians got it right. Etc.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hope he died in battle just in case the Norse are correct

He did, he died battling cancer.

[–] hume_lemmy@lemmy.ca 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Well, the cancer died, too. So technically it was a tie.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

pascals wager is incredibly stupid and illogical. What about other 10 billion religions? What if accepting jesus now puts you down with 9,999,999,999 other religions?

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago

Supply-side Jesus

[–] humanamerican@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Adams had many detestable views, but I interpreted this as a sarcastic quip, mocking those who seriously think that way.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is the guy that literally begged Donald Trump to cure his cancer.

[–] humanamerican@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

No he begged Trump to strong-arm KP into giving him special treatment. That's just nepotism, not magical thinking.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Yeah he was obsessed with his own intelligence and loved mocking those who disagreed with him

[–] shutz@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Les paris stupides...

[–] radio@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Gods hate him!

See how he faked his way into heaven using this one weird trick!