620
this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2026
620 points (97.5% liked)
science
23496 readers
334 users here now
A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.
rule #1: be kind
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The US could have also taken the Sackler family out to sea and disappeared them, but we didn't. I think that would have been an appropriate punishment (if a little too lenient) for engineering a nationwide addiction crisis.
But your point stands.
The American brand is permanently tarnished, and it's going to be a bummer to see the consequences unfold in the coming years.
The coming decades, probably. This won't be right in my lifetime.
It's wild to think that with the same amount of power Obama and Biden had, that Donald has completely rearranged the landscape of American politics, and once the post-tariff trade agreements kick in (rerouting supply chains around rather than through the US) and the BBB puts the kill shot on the poor and middle class, I think that the next year or two will be a clear historical demarcation line.
I'm not sure about that. This presidency is more than 50 years in the making, involved a stolen vote, multiple billionaire co-conspirators, even Obama was like "how do we stop this??" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VnhBrVb_aaw
They have all the authors of p25 behind them, the house, the senate, the judiciary, the POTUS, the whole shootin' match.
I'm with you dude. Solid points all around.
We need to have a viable plan for when he cancels elections. I don't know how to make such a plan, but we need it yesterday.
Personally, I don't think it's going to end up being logistically possible for Donald's government to do that, owing to elections being run at the state level instead of federal. I am sure they will identify a few key races and counties and attempt to intimidate voters though.
Even with his Gestapo, he can't even control a handful of major cities.
I hope you're right. They could also steal the election again.
Feel like I'm wearing a foil hat whenever I type that, but the stats are convincing.
https://electiontruthalliance.org/
God's help us.
Door to door raids are the vote cancelation.
They'll start taking whoever they want on a large scale now that it's been tried and warmed up on darker-than-paper-bag.
I mean. Unless the militarized offices are deactivated.
Maybe American Spring should start good and earlybwith the climate change weather.
We could start rebuilding civil inferstructure before our monocropping pays us in famine.
Did Biden ever have a majority in both houses? I know Obama had it for the first two years and that's how he got Obamacare through. Neither of them had SCOTUS stacked in their favour and ruling them immune from their own intervention.
Idk I say we should've just given them a taste of their own medicine, but only like a week's taste, then strip their wealth.
The first ones free and after that I will rinse you
I wish this were true. But after Iraq? After Vietnam? A Cold War that nearly wiped out the entire human race? After CIA sponsored coups from Brazil to Guatamala? Henry Ford was passing out copies of "The International Jew" all over Germany during the 1920s. Roosevelt forced the Platt Amendment down Cuba's throat. McKinley oversaw a genocide in the Philippines. Polk gave us the Annexation of Texas and the revitalization of the North American slave trade. Anyone ask Andrew Jackson what happened to all the Cherokee down in Florida?
America is a country with unlimited do-overs. Our brand is never tarnished. We are always and forever a Shining City On A Hill even as Ronnie fucking Raygun is sponsoring nun rape down in Nicaragua.
The events you're describing are the history of every major world power. The global power that hasn't participated in numerous atrocities does not exist.
The difference here is the loss of domestic rule of law and its cascading downstream effects for global cooperation and trade, which yes, will create significant future problems for the US and its brand. This will become more evident in a year to a year-and-a-half when the post-tariff trade agreements take effect, for a start. China is the obvious beneficiary.
But could get a whole lot worse a whole lot faster depending on how far Donald decides to push his unilateral warmongering, and whether or not Congress does anything about it.
Almost as though power is accrued at the expense of the vulnerable.
The only countries that the US has alienated are ones it is explicitly sanctioning. Nobody else is actually cutting ties.
China's the trade-alternative for countries under US sanctions, precisely because Trump's done a ham-fisted job of diplomacizing with his counterparts overseas. But a future Pete Buttigieg administration can patch that up if he chooses. There is more to be gained by doing business with the US than with Venezuela or Iran or Cuba. Chinese leaders know that and act accordingly.
Sure. Or it could come to a grinding halt if Trump loses control of Congress and falls into lame duck status three years early. Already, we're seeing sharp divides even inside the GOP, which already operates on thin margins in the face of a Dem election wave.
Plenty of precedent for an unpopular President to get sidelined by skilled and ambitious legislators. And the US has demonstrated time and time again that it has the manpower and the infrastructure to rebound quickly under strong, competent leadership.
We're almost certainly going to face a nasty recession going into the next few years. But we're still a massive, hugely populated, highly technical, heavily industrialized economy. Losing unipolar status isn't the end of the empire. A bad few years of economic contraction isn't the end of the world.
Now... the long tail of climate change... that's another story. If the Colorado River dries up before it reaches Arizona, we're going to see some shit flying.
A lot of the manpower has been sacked. Replacing those people and getting them to a point of strong competency will take years and years and a lot of money.
Second best time to plant a tree is today. #guesswebettergettowork
There might be a difference now. The US has always warmongered, but it did know who it could gonafter without consequences. Geopolitically, Vietnam, Iraq, and all these other countries hardly mattered. These could be attacked and nobody would lift a finger to stop it.
Greenland would be different. That would damage the relationship with its European allies a lot. A relationship the USA has depended on for a long time.
It's wild because in China they would have done exactly that. Well, they tend to be more efficient with corporate criminals than charter a whole damn boat. A brick wall and a revolver is the normal way enemies of the people meet their end. (When they haven't cut the leadership in enough at least in some cases.)