this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2025
449 points (99.1% liked)

News

33779 readers
2529 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An Oklahoma man who was doing target practice in his backyard on Christmas is believed to have shot and killed an elderly woman a few blocks from his home, authorities said.

Cody Wayne Adams, 33, has been charged with first-degree manslaughter in connection with the deadly shooting, court filings show.

The victim was on a covered front porch with family members at a residence in Comanche when she was shot Thursday afternoon, according to the probable cause affidavit. She was holding a baby in her left arm while seated on a love seat when she was struck in her right upper arm, according to the affidavit. The bullet then entered her chest cavity, it said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 75 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If only that baby were armed, it could have returned fire and everything would have been okay. More guns is the solution!

[–] SoloCritical@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (5 children)

It’s insane to me how many people think that taking guns away will actually increase the violence.. like the people that would normally shoot up a place would suddenly become experts at building bombs and take out WAY more people.. when the reality is that those people would probably be more likely to blow themselves up trying to build a bomb.. guns are so simple to kill with, a toddler could do it. Building a bomb or something equivalent is much harder than pulling a trigger.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 2 points 1 hour ago

Most school shooters obtained their guns from family members. Its literally a crisis enabled by easy access to weapons.

The shear amount of accidental shootings combined with the amount of violence that really wouldn't occur without easy access to guns is the main reason I'll never own one. A gun is an implement of death. It is designed for one thing only, to most effectively rip a piece of metal through a body in a deadly manner. Any situation that a gun is introduced to becomes a potentially deadly situation. I've heard it suggested to apply the concept of Checkovs Gun to real life, that once someone pulls out a gun even as a "hey check out my cool new gun!" assume it will be fired by the end of the scene and leave before you can find yourself a part of that ending.

I also fully recognize that as a middle class white male, my safety is about as guaranteed by society as it can get. Many people are not so lucky and may very well be on their own when it comes to personal safety. I respect that, but I beg all firearm owners to please take every possible precaution. Regularly take self defense trainings, make sure that your firearm is not going to just be turned on you, make sure that you're legally clear in defending yourself with it, and be absolutely certain that it is appropriately locked and protected from anyone else in your household or who enters your dwelling from taking it. Also have a plan should your own mental health take a downturn. Have a trusted individual who can convince you to sell your firearm or otherwise ensure you don't have access to it until your mental state improves sufficiently. By owning a firearm understand you are owning a potential for death, appreciate that gravity and take every precaution necessary to minimize that potential

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago

Name and shame em

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 13 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

If the polive was actually useful, then maybe getting rid of guns could be a good thing.

But as an Asian American. I know about the Korean Americans during LA Riots who had to protect their stores by themselves because the authorities didn't give a shit.

Asian Diaspora are one of the most vulnerable groups. Because a lot of us have successful bussinesses and racists are jealous and like to target us.

So I'd prefer well regulated militias than police. Especially in the context of America where cops are horrible.

[–] axexrx@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Especially since we have a model of what that society looks like, with places like Japan and great britain, most of Europe etc. They de-escalate to knife crime picking up the majority.

[–] possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone -4 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

vehicle ramming attacks are constantly increasing. people who want to kill will find a way to kill with whatever tools they have available.

[–] SoloCritical@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago

I’d choose you trying to run me down with a vehicle over shooting at me with an AR15 any day of the week.

[–] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Then perhaps we should not let those people possess guns. Or vehicles , now that I think of it.

Perhaps give them no weapons. Yes, yes, that’s it. Take weapons away from crazy people. Hey! I got it! Let’s get them into a database so we can see if they have murderous tendencies. Perhaps a test of some sort in order to own any weapons.

What do you think?