this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
832 points (98.0% liked)

News

36043 readers
2813 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The former president and first lady threw their weight behind the presumptive Democratic nominee

Barack and Michelle Obama have endorsed Kamala Harris for the Democratic nomination for president, sharing the news in a joint phone call.

A video released by the campaign suggests the former president and first lady called Harris on Thursday while the vice president was in Houston, where she addressed the American Federation of Teachers and received a briefing on recovery efforts following Hurricane Beryl. 

“We called to say, Michelle and I couldn’t be prouder to endorse you and do everything we can to get you through this election and into the Oval Office,” Barack Obama is heard telling Harris in a 55-second video of the call. 

“This is going to be historic,” Michelle Obama tells Harris.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 150 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Michelle: When they go low we go high.

Kamala: Let the meme trolling begin!

If we do end up descending into a Draconian hellhole of an autocratic dictatorship at least the election run-up is going to be exponentially more entertaining than it was going to be with Joe.

I say that dictatorship part because don't think for a second that the GOP is gonna just roll over and die. Expect hard-line challenges to vote counts in every single swing state.

[–] ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world 38 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I say that dictatorship part because don’t think for a second that the GOP is gonna just roll over and die. Expect hard-line challenges to vote counts in every single swing state.

I've been saying this since Sunday. We just blew up the Death Star, but the Empire is still a threat. The fight ain't over, yet.

[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago (5 children)

How did we blow up the Death Star? No victories have been achieved yet.

This is more like Han hanging over the reigns of the Millenium Falcon to Lando in RotJ. The battle hasn’t even begun.

[–] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

I disagree. Biden pulled a master political move that isn’t the Death Star blowing up, but it’s still a deft maneuver for the republic.

Consider that Trump was shot at and just two weeks later we aren’t talking about it. The RNC happened and it’s not in the news. The only thing in the news is Trump dropped out to run away from Kamala. It’s an insanely smart political move. The republicans are so upset they’re filing impeachment papers, yelling about democracy, and threatening with the law. They’re so scared that they’re scrambling to do anything.

And Trump being shot at didn’t get him anything in the polls. That’s how crazy this all is

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah for real. While I am happy to see such excitement around Harris, this is far from over. Too many people celebrating prematurely. Remember 2016???

[–] cor315@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No one was excited about Clinton.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That's just not true. Maybe you weren't, but this country is full of neo-libs.

Also, maybe you forget, but Kamala ran in the 2020 primary. A LOT fewer people were excited about her than they were about Clinton. By orders of magnitude. You can literally measure it if you wanted.

The current "excitement" is not due to the person, it's due to the situation. The same fucking thing would be happening if Biden had chosen fucking Gabrielle Giffords (or literally anyone else under the age of 70 without an 'R' next to their name) way back then.

He could have chosen three Colombia University pro-Palestine protestors stacked up under a trenchcoat, and people would be "excited" right now about them taking Biden's place.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

The Death Star by that point had been blown up quite conclusively.

This is not the battle. This is some senate noise 1-2 years PBY nobody is going to remember after.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Well, I can’t wait to see who’s chosen to play Nien Nunb.

[–] vxx@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

There's a "simple" solution to prevent their civil war plans. You got to crush them at the voting stations so hard that every question about foul play gets destroyed in its roots.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Donald Trump could very well roll over and die and I would be ok with that. The only downside is not getting to know that he is in prison being miserable

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The Heritage Foundation and its plan to cement autocratic fascist rule in the US will survive Trump.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Which is why they got trump to pick Vance for VP, who is young and all in on project 2025, to be their chosen figurehead for the future. They don't care about or like trump; they're just using him as their vehicle to get in power and that's it. After that they're fine with/hoping for him to drop dead ASAP after the inauguration so they can usher in their full agenda. Meantime trump is only the symbolic figurehead and if by chance he doesn't go along with their plans (unlikely), they can always use the 25th Amendment to get rid of him.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

I can’t imagine a Vance presidency

[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Somehow he'd still have a voice in prison. Kinda like all those interviews with Ted Bundy and Charles Manson et al.

His biggest misery would be to be alive and completely silenced.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

So a stroke.

Well, he’s old as fuck and eats McDonald’s for most meals. I’m also not sure if anyone would notice, so there’s a good chance it would be a bad one.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago

Donald Trump is 78 years old, that is not unheard of that people might die at that age of entirely natural causes.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The list of things “the Democrats want to take away” is going to be massive.

[–] Kellamity@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)
  • guns
  • freedom
  • ~~profitable~~ good healthcare
  • freedom
  • national security
  • guns
  • ~~white supremacy~~ The American Way
  • Your rights ~~if you count~~
  • christianity?
  • freedom
  • ~~transphobia~~ family values
  • the cops' ability to commit unchecked violence
  • guns and freedom
  • 1940s textbooks

All of these things are at risk.

[–] telllos@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

They should really take your guns though...

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

So far their biggest whinge is plastic straws. Not the hill most voters are willing to die on

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Expect hard-line challenges to vote counts in every single swing state.

Exactly like they did last time? Remember Rudy Giuliani doing all these shenanigans last time? Cyber ninjas?

Only difference is that I find it doubtful Joe Biden will try to disrupt proceedings on January 6, 2025. I think it would be awkward for him to ask his VP to not certify the results if Kamala Harris wins.