this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
21 points (95.7% liked)

Horror Games

247 readers
1 users here now

Games with horror themes and/or settings, gameplay. Survival horror, narrative/adventure horror, horror RPGs, even city-builder horror. Interactive horror experiences.

Silent Hill, Amnesia, System Shock, Resident Evil, Soma, Call of Cthulhu, Last Survivor, Alien: Isolation, Alan Wake, Mouthwashing and many more...


Horror-focused communities across the Threadiverse:


Some other gaming communities across the Threadiverse:


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Piefed.world Rules - https://legal.piefed.world/tos

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No spam, illegal content, or games with excessive, non-artistic NSFW content (e.g. hentai or porn games).

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. discussions about movies/media based on horror gaming franchises) are fine.


founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Yes. They had to clarify that every character is “obviously” over the age of 20.

That’s not a claim that gets made if there was no way to make the mistake.

Are you just willingly ignoring all the facts and details right in front of you to spin this fantasy of yours?

And you are only using the current build, your information isn’t even applicable to the topic.

My copy doesn’t have naked kids, so it never did.

That’s your defense, when the game was stated to have been banned for… you guessed it! But are going to ignore it.

Do you just lack basic reading comprehension skills? Or do you not know how to critically think for yourself?

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

You're actually just wrong. The naked person in that scene was the horse/human. Never the not being treated as a horse person.

[–] plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

According to the dev…? Did he provide proof? Nope. Just deflects blame to valve instead. What a dev….

You can’t say the boogeyman doesn’t exist, then use the same for your defence. There was material that broke rules. They changed it to be acceptable.

Literally the one thing you can’t do is child sexual material. Read between the fucking lines lmfao.

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah took the wind out of your sails finding out your outrage was based on poor reading comprehension didn't it. No apology for me?

[–] plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Why would I apologize to a pedo defender who lacks basic reading comprehension skills lmfao. How deluded are you?

Do you even know what the term means? I just blew your defense apart by using your own, and you say I deflated my sails? Fucking lmfao.

If my defense fails, so does yours, because it’s the same as yours you mook.