this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2025
611 points (98.6% liked)

World News

51283 readers
1386 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

US forces have seized an oil tanker off the coast of Venezuela, in a major escalation of Donald Trump’s four-month pressure campaign against the South American country’s dictator, Nicolás Maduro.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] almost1337@lemmy.zip 15 points 3 days ago (7 children)

According to the NY Times the tanker in question is flying under a flag where it is not registered, and is linked to smuggling Iranian oil.

[–] Philippe23@lemmy.ca 25 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So is the US going to start seizing all the Russia ghost tankers doing the same?

[–] almost1337@lemmy.zip 13 points 3 days ago

The Chinese ghost fishing fleet too, imo

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Yes, they should but Ukraine's drones are already on it.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 24 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The phrase "is linked to" should be a massive red flag.

If it was smuggling Iranian oil it would say, "is smuggling Iranian oil", not "is linked to smuggling Iranian oil".

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago

Also all lots of "may" and "[unnamed] American official claimed" in the article.

The whole thing reads as Propaganda, which makes sense given that we're talking about the pro-Zionist New York Times (which also has a long history of backing American warmongering in, for example Iraq) - morally a little propagandizing to whitewash American Administration's piracy on the high-seas is nothing compared to relentlessly providing cover and support for the active mass murdering of Palestinian children in Gaza for more than a year.

The Pravda in the days of the Soviet Union had more truth than this Propaganda Outlet.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

The ship was already sanctioned in 2022 tho

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The problem is Trump has no credibility. Nobody is going to believe it.

[–] VoteNixon2016@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The US has no credibility, from the USS Maine to the Gulf of Tonkin to this

[–] almost1337@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago

True enough, but the ghost fleets of oil tankers and ocean fishing vessels are a real problem as well. I would say that I find it unlikely that this administration would go out of their way to do the paperwork for possibly legal targets when they've been so ruthlessly attacking non-legit targets, but the stakes are also higher with the monetary value of the oil.

Why are you quoting Israeli propaganda? The New York Crimes has lost all its credibility with the constant support of genocide in Palestine

[–] clot27@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago

Fuck the new york times, fucking imperialist propaganda outlet

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Did they say why Venezuela would smuggle Iranian oil? I thought it was an oil rich country? I didn’t see it in the article. Maybe I missed it.

[–] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If so, that would be a money laundering thing where they relabel the oil as from them to avoid sanctions on iran oil export.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago

Okay yeah that makes sense. I didn’t think of that.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Venezuela wants to sell oil, but is under sanctions. Iran wants to buy oil, but is under sanctions.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That makes sense. I was thinking Iran probably had oil too, but I don’t know enough about their imports/exports.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 2 points 2 days ago

Iran has the second-largest reserves in the world. However production is limited by ageing infrastructure and sanctions. It is also the second-largest oil consumer, as the cheap cost has meant there has been no incentive for efficient use.