Programmer Humor

33451 readers

1322 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

Keep content in english
No advertisements
Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
- If the mod doesn't find it funny, you're banned. Ha-ha!... For real: do not use the community for "statements". There are other places for such content. Keep it chill and funny.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

Feyter@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

BurningTurtle@programming.dev

pylapp@programming.dev

697

Electron apps (lemmy.world)

submitted 10 months ago by ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev

140 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

For Spotify it sort of makes sense though, right? It buffers a few songs ahead of time so using any free RAM seems valid

[–] DaGeek247@fedia.io 38 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The average spotify 3:40 song is going to be about 4MB. This only changes to triple (10MB at the same length for premium and high quality) that size when you pay for it.

If Spotify is using more than 50MB on the audio cache, they absolutely deserve to get ragged on for it.

[–] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Ah true, that is pretty bad then

[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago

I don't think it buffers more than one song ahead right, that would be wasteful?