this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2025
1793 points (99.3% liked)

Science Memes

20668 readers
2569 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Meta Post Tags



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


If you are here asking: "Is this a science meme?"

Probably, yes. We use the Dawkins definition of meme: a replicating idea, not just an image macro with a fact on it. A good post here doesn't need to teach you something. It needs to make you ask something: who, what, where, when, and especially why or how.

Science isn't a filing cabinet of facts, it's a conversation. For example, a photo of an eel or other localized wildlife counts because most people never see one, and wonder is the first step of inquiry. A car meme counts if it makes you curious about what's under the bonnet. If you want to talk about something you noticed in the world, chances are someone else wants to talk about it too.

We moderate for vibe, not category. Pruning is light, especially where a post creates interesting discussion. Experimenting is encouraged.

See the pinned paper on Shitposting as Public Pedagogy if you want the academic case for why this works.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So, you agree patents and copyrights are contrary to capitalism and free markets?

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Personally, I think that if small business capitalism actually existed then it would run contrary to that.

There would be no need for copyright or patents. These systems create artificial scarcity which hinders society as a whole to benefit a minority.

I feel like our existing system of laissez-faire capitalism fully embraces the rent seeking found in intellectual property.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think there is a balance to be made. Some anti capitalist measures are needed to encourage innovation. But the use of patent laws as a defence, or copyright to seek excessive rent are far too aggressive.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

If there is any chance of reform it would have to still appeal to all parties. We definitely need to think about solutions that have not been proposed before.

As much as I would like to advocate for abolishment of IP, I recognize it is an unrealistic demand.

After all, IP didn't magically appear. It took hundreds of years of court cases and laws passed to get to the arguably ridiculous point we are now.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I like the idea of having to pay a fee to retain copyright. And that fee doubles every year.

It starts off low but after a decade or two it becomes more economical to let the copyright lapse.

Patents should be scrapped completely.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Oh, I like that because it puts a ever increasing burden to use it or lose it. Once it is no longer profitable it goes back to public domain.

I find patents of dubious value to say the least. It is definitely the worst part of IP.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 7 months ago

If there is any chance of reform it would have to still appeal to all parties.

There's nothing such as change that appeals to all parties; that is not how that works. Change, good or bad, is forced by one segment of society over another, doubly so when it's against the interests of the ultra-rich. Don't compromise in advance.