this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2025
173 points (99.4% liked)

News

33231 readers
1972 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aramis87@fedia.io 45 points 1 day ago (3 children)

borrowers taking on a five-decade loan would struggle to build equity—with most payments in the first decade being on interest rather than principal. With limited equity, homeowners would have less of a financial cushion should a shock occur—a drop in house prices or unexpected expense—and therefore be at "greater risk of default on these loans." Given this heightened risk, Zandi said interest rates would be "significantly higher" than on standard 30-year mortgages, eliminating many of the cost savings that would result from the longer repayment period.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Let's also not forget that the biggest obstacle for first time homebuyers is not the monthly payments (which are typically similar to or even lower than their current rent rates, but with the added benefit of building equity) but to saving for the down payment while paying that rent. A 50 year mortgage only serves to prop up already inflated home prices, not to decrease them, meaning it does nothing at all to help someone actually become a home owner in the first place.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 3 points 21 hours ago

The cost difference is insane.

For a $500k loan at 6% you're looking at $580k in interest over 30 years or about $1.1M total.

For the same house over 50 years at even 1% higher APR, you're looking at $1.3M in interest alone or $1.8M total.

You'd pay more in interest alone than you would for the entire principle + interest of a conventional 30 year mortgage and the difference in monthly payment between the two (not that this should really ever be part of the equation) is only $10, so where the fuck is the "savings?"

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So it’s just a scheme to squeeze the little guy more.

They want to eventually own all housing and rent it, don’t they?

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is renting, just the bank is your landlord and you’re responsible for all bills and repairs.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe more akin to "rent to own" since I guess you (or your children since you'll probably be dead at that point) will own the property after 50 years.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

But if you don't have kids the bank just keeps it