this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2025
426 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

76945 readers
3059 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nuko147@lemmy.world 102 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If an AI bubble pops, no one is getting out clean.

He means the taxpayers.

[–] e461h@sh.itjust.works 58 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Privatize the profits, socialize the losses

[–] conorab@lemmy.conorab.com 17 points 1 day ago

“We should privatise service X so it’s more efficient” X collapses “We can’t afford to let X fail despite the fact that it ran at massive profits all the way to it’s collapse so we’ll bail it out” THEN WHAT WAS THE POINT OF PRIVATISING IT IN THE FIRST PLACE?!

You can take on the burden of running the thing and therefore the cost of making it public, or you can allow it to be private with the caveat that they must pay a substantial (enough for the government to not be at a net loss) tax as a kind of insurance in the event a bailout is needed, but don’t take on the worst of both worlds where the profits are private and the losses are public.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Let the taxpayers prop up failing companies. Corpo welfare is the good kind of welfare even though most of the money gets sucked up by the Executives and share buy backs.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At least China is right about not bailing out their companies when their own property bubble collapsed.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The bar can't be "not as corrupt as America". That's not a bar, that's the ground. They can and should do better.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh I'm not trying to defend or exalt China. I'm saying that we should be like China when it comes to dealing with billionaires. Or even better, be like Vietnam, when the court ordered a billionaire who defrauded thousands to pay in time or be executed.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

The amount of bailing out should be inversely proportionate to the amount of people fired during record profits.