News

36292 readers

2782 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.

7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

JonsJava@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

Minnesota Dems Push to Repeal School Ban on Restraint That Killed George Floyd (www.the74million.org)

submitted 2 years ago by gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Nearly four years after George Floyd suffocated to death while being pinned face down to the pavement by a police officer, Minnesota Democrats are fast-tracking legislation that would undo a less-than-year-old ban prohibiting school-based cops from using that same type of restraint on students.

As early as Monday, the state’s House of Representatives is slated to consider a proposal that presents a drastic departure from provisions approved by Democratic Gov. Tim Walz — rules that explicitly barred school resource officers from using face-down “prone restraint.”

The ban was part of a broader police reform movement that followed Floyd’s murder. The fatal physical hold led to the largest civil rights protest in U.S. history, a national reckoning on racism, policy reforms that sought to address police brutality and, in Minneapolis and dozens of districts nationwide, the removal of sworn officers from school campuses. In Minnesota, new state rules barred police officers from using chokeholds on people and prone restraints were banned in the state’s prisons.

Now, as the state’s Democrats make a 180-degree turn on the campus reform, education equity advocates have accused state leaders of falling to the political pressure of law enforcement groups ahead of a November election where party lawmakers seek to maintain their narrow majority in the state House. The proposal cleared the House Ways and Means committee earlier this week.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20240304131847/https://www.the74million.org/article/minnesota-dems-push-to-repeal-school-ban-on-restraint-that-killed-george-floyd/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Unfortunately, a lot of the country will only vote for Democrats who barely dip their toe into the left side of the spectrum to throw people a bone on occasion.

That's the only way a Democrat got elected to the Senate in West Virginia. It was Joe Manchin.

I hate it so much.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That’s the only way a Democrat got elected to the Senate in West Virginia. It was Joe Manchin.

If you ignore history...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_senators_from_West_Virginia

In 2015 a Republican became senator, the last Republican before that left office in 1959.

Granted, Manchin got Byrd's seat after 50 years, and Byrd had pretty much the views you'd expect for a Senator that started in 1959.

But the recent change is Republican senators from WV.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

Don't forget the Democrat governor who switched parties as soon as he took office

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

That’s the only way a Democrat got elected to the Senate in West Virginia. It was Joe Manchin.

Manchin comes from an obscenely wealthy coal family in the state. He could have run under either party and won in a ~~landlord~~ landslide based on that alone.

He just got more concessions from the Democrats, who were more than happy to trade away legislative priorities for a Senate Majority.