this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2025
311 points (92.6% liked)

politics

26427 readers
2643 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Younger men threw their support behind Donald Trump in 2024 after favoring Biden in 2020

The United States is still not ready for a female president after more than a century of unsuccessful campaigns for the White House, according to former First Lady Michelle Obama.

“As we saw in this past election, sadly, we ain’t ready,” Obama said earlier this month in a live conversation with actor Tracee Ellis Ross that was published Friday.

“That’s why I’m like, don’t even look at me about running, because you all are lying,” she said. “You’re not ready for a woman. You are not. So don’t waste my time.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

A full three time, total. Twenty four years between the first two of them.

Why do you think that is? Might it be that strategists are reading the room (the country)? Nah, it couldn't be...

How do you not?

Is that a serious question? Are we going to ignore the DNC shenanigans around Hillary / Bernie?

I’ve seen very little evidence to suggest women do worse than men on average

I guess we can ignore each of the instances where there was a woman on the POTUS / VPOTUS ticket. Got it.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Why do you think that is?

Because men had a 120 year head start at electoral politics. More time, more opportunities, more generations of fathers training their sons to be politicians than mothers training their daughters.

Are we going to ignore the DNC shenanigans around Hillary / Bernie?

Hillary out-muscled Bernie the old fashioned way. You'd have an easier time arguing Obama pulled the rug out from under Hillary (re: Michigan). At least that was a close race.

I guess we can ignore each of the instances where there was a woman on the POTUS / VPOTUS ticket

You're ignoring all the instances where there wasn't. You think LBJ would have lost to Goldwater if Humphrey had tits? Or that Reagan needed Bush's dick to crush Mondale by 20 points? Do you think Obama needed to be a man to win, when he was already playing with the biggest handicap in national politics?

Put your name on the ballot and, statically speaking, your gender simply does not matter.

[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You should read more about Political Science, you'd understand a lot more and you wouldn't have to pull made up numbers from your ass.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

My Brother in Christ, you need to read more English, because you don't seem to understand the words on your screen.