this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2025
611 points (99.0% liked)

RetroGaming

25673 readers
40 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam, AI slop, or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 94 points 1 week ago (33 children)

The game gear had two major issues:

-It was too far ahead of its time (something SEGA unfortunately did multiple times, cfr Dreamcast's online gaming capabilities)

-Battery life sucked major donkey cock

It was also somewhat pricey, but the former point was paramount.

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 53 points 1 week ago (17 children)

The battery life was hilariously bad, it was almost the defining trait. It was made especially prominent since it was being compared to the OG Game Boy which could go 20 hours on four AA batteries. The GG could only go about five, if you were lucky, on six AA. Mine basically lived plugged into the wall with a long extension code so I could use it from anywhere in my bedroom.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (15 children)

The GG could only go about five, if you were lucky, on six AA

Which, while of course requiring exponentially more power, the Switch 2 only goes for about 6 hours on less demanding games, funny how battery life hasn't really changed much for advanced handhelds.

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is also why I have never considered the Switch a portable system. It was a hybrid that was never quite a "real" console or a handheld, and thus made compromises on both ends. I personally never used the Switch undocked, I'd have rather they sold a fixed model with no screen or joycons that just plugged in.

The real reason that Game Gear was so power hungry is that it was just a Sega Master System crammed into a handheld. This is why it felt wildly better and more advanced then the Game Boy. Sega did the same thing years later with the Sega Nomad aka a Genesis crammed into a handheld.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

the real reason it was such a bitch for power is that it had a compact flourescent tube for the backlight.

when you remove that and replace it with a LED backlight suddenly the battery life explodes.

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I figured the backlight was a big part of it. crazy that people actually modded a game gear

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You would not believe the amount of mods the GameGear has, my dude.

and they are expensive as fuck, lol

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I can't say I loved the Game gear enough to go that route, but seeing as I have had people try to argue with me that E.T. for the Atari 2600 is actually a fine game, there are enthusiasts for everything.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

Nostalgia is a hell of a drug.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

I'm generally of the same opinion about the Switch, but it's amazing to be able to play it on flights

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)