this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
304 points (95.8% liked)

Showerthoughts

38219 readers
1289 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Cancer can't be cured because it isn't 1 thing. And animal testing regardless of the benefit humans may receive is morally wrong.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There are many types of cancer with very high remission rates after treatment.

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

Treatment isn't a cure.

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And animal testing regardless of the benefit humans may receive is morally wrong.

You can say whatever you want, but just because you feel it really hard doesnt mean it will be convincing to other people.

In this particular case, I think animal testing is moral as fuck, because why in the fuck would I possibly value animal lives even close to that of a human or myself.

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Why do you matter more than any other animal?

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Because I care about me more than any other animal.

If someone tried to kill you, would you just let them or not?

Any sane answer says you value you more than someone else.

Its crazy you find this opinion applied to animals to be offensive.

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Humans, particularly those in modern societies, live outside of natural order. We don't contribute anything to it and just use it up. We slaughter millions of animals that we first rape to keep manufacturing them like their products. The animals were experiment in often never see the sky or feel the earth. You matter more than them?

Yeah, I'm the crazy one...

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yup, that sounds crazy AF.

Its a wonder you think you'll convert anyone just by sounding batshit insane.

I'm human. You think I would think my own species matters less than a different one? No other species thinks differently, why would we feel any different, especially given our massively different capabilities thought wise?

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I know I won't change anyone's mind.

What other species kills at the level humans do? The shear fact you mention our capabilities proves my point; we do horrible things when we have the capability to choose not to.

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I know I won’t change anyone’s mind.

So why are you spouting off about it? To what end?

What other species kills at the level humans do? The shear fact you mention our capabilities proves my point; we do horrible things when we have the capability to choose not to.

This could apply for so many things, but not testing for medical purposes. Thats you being irrationally idealistic past the point of stupidity.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Your philosophy is antithetical to existence.

Being alive kills other things, nature is competition. From bacteria and viruses in your body constantly being killed, to animals in the food supply (even veggies and croplands have pest control), just living in a safe community relies on the killing of other life: removing dangerous animals from the community, keeping pests out of food stores, keeping the water clean (kills water based life)

The phone you are using is at the end of a very complicated supply chain that mines resources from the earth, which requires killing animals... Moving resources across the earth, which requires killing animals (fish hit by boats, animals run over by cars, birds hit by trucks, pest control in all the production and storage facilities), etc.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So what, we just test things in a dish and then hope it works in a complex organism? Because the other alternative is human testing.

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

We do like every other animal on the planet and die.

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The funny thing about this very dumb take, is if the people who believed it followed through, the idea would eventually die out.

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Followed through with what? Talk about dumb takes.

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Dying vs using medicines that had any animal testing involved in their creation.

This wasn't particularly complex, but maybe complex for someone with your take.

[–] ebolapie@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

You have fun with that, I'll take the medicine.