United Kingdom
General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
view the rest of the comments
This wouldn't matter so much if 1) Arts Council funding hadn't been decimated under austerity and 2) Working class people could afford to buy art.
The pool of people who can afford to keep the arts alive is rapidly diminishing. I work with artists and see this week in week out but it's the same with everything.
Rich man moves to the village and everyone goes to work for him.
Temu are stealing her work and profiting from it. It matters - clearly there are a bunch of people who can afford to keep art alive who are spending their money at Temu rather than with her. Sort that out - currently it’s pretty much a risk free crime for the third party seller- and then art can be less dependent on public spending and thus more robust
Isn't Temu just a bunch of shady Chinese resellers in a trenchcoat like Amazon?
Temu sell it for just over the cost of production, while the artist sells it with a high mark up, there's a difference in affordability.
Well, kinda. Their cost of production is lower partly because they don't have to pay an artist enough to feed themselves. Your costs are always lower when you don't pay for stuff that those playing by the rules do.
Art takes time, money and creativity to make. Of course that's going to be more expensive than downloading something someone else made and printing it out. Accounting for the time and costs that go into making art isn't a high markup, it's being paid for your labour.
As a working class person who can't afford art and has always pirates everything this is accurate.
Just a few small questions, out of interest - would you buy art if it was significantly cheaper, or free? Or would it just be so low on your priority list that it would never be important enough?
If it was very cheap, or free, would you take "whatever was on offer", or would you still have very particular tastes in what you liked?
It's too low on the priority list. Rent, bills, food etc. all come first.
I only buy e.g. video games that are exceptionally enjoyable and exceptionally niche or an album on bandcamp of an artist who's work I particularly enjoy with exceptionally few plays where 1 sale might make a difference, and even then I usually limit any such spend in total to a max of £20 at most, and it's something I would only spend once a month at most, normally rarer.
Higher prices are a deterrent.
For instance when I was trying to leave Spotify, I had no good piracy sources for one of the albums from my Spotify library, so I went to the artist's page on bandcamp and it was priced at £12 or something as minimum, when she was some indie Lana del Rey type "moan to a synth a bit" and it was nothing special, just decent vocals. Long story short I just shrugged, removed the song from my playlists both on Spotify and locally and now I no longer remember who the artist in question was, I instead bought the entire discography of a different, more unique artist at £2 per album.
As for like, drawings/paintings, I intrinsically see them as having almost zero value and cannot see myself ever paying for one, I would sooner invest in a printer and print something off Google images for a poster than anything else If I even could put up posters without running afoul of the rental agreement. On an emotional level - when I grew up, all images were just something on the internet that was free, watermarks and Shutterstock meant to prevent you from right clicking and saving an image and all that crap to me are seen as enshittification.
I would definitely never buy art for art's sake, it would be highly specific things. Out of all the people I know IRL, I'm basically the only one who considers paying for art generally, which probably has something to do with the fact I'm sympathetic because I'm a hobbyist musician. In fact most people I know don't even seem to have the attention span for music at all anymore, they just don't listen to any music at all (which isn't my fault I swear lol).
It always matters. Temu simply stealing the work of others. Temu is the one which exploits others, not the Arts Council or austerity.
And those who benefit from sales on Temu are among the wealthiest globally.
I didn't say it wouldn't matter. I said it wouldn't matter as much.