News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
Yall are worried about banks when a massive bet on AI makes up over 30% of the S&P 500?
Too big to fail man. That's getting bailed out. Its a bet that cant be lost.
I dont mean theyll cover they whole s&p investment. Key holders of large quantities of certain stocks will be given assistance.
You or I could buy up a whole bunch and theyll just laugh at us while they sign the check the Sam amd his buddies.
Worry not, 350 millions Americans stand ready - willing or otherwise - to save the Finance Industry by enduring some more Austerity, losing some more income in real terms due to unacknowledged inflation following another bout of money printing and suffering the consequence of more cuts to whatever is left of public services in America.
An worry not, if there's one thing that unwaveringly unites Republicans and Democrats, it's this.
How about a 1 trillion dollar crypto coin as collateral? It's actually a picture of a monkey peeing in its own mouth.
I'm looking for something far less stable than Zimbabwean currency my dear friend. I'm thinking more like a presidential nft.
Too big to save.
The ammount of money in these companies for AI (~~4.5B~~ 3.9T for Micosoft alone) is too much for even the US to bail them out.
Edit: Double checked the number -- I was off by 3 orders of magnitude because these numbers are just dumb.
Well, one can dream.
If you didn't read the article, the concern is that mid-sized banks have done a lot of lending to outsized customers who have screwed them, and the market is taking this traditional indicator of a traditional bubble, with all the same dynamics as 2008, as a signal of market instability.
The AI circular economy is not entirely over-leveraged debt. Over-leveraged debt is a very traditional form of economic trouble, so it's more clearly seen as "oooh, we got some shit going down here!"
Crashes can precipitate from small points of failure that are intertwined with bigger investments. The market is like a powder keg with people wanting to keep money in as far up as possible and wanting to pull out to avoid being the bigger loser holding the bag, so it makes sense people will look into points of critical failure where such starts.
Judging by last time around, shit will spread from "bad industries" to the rest as the money necessary to cover the bad bets gets pulled out from saner investments.
This time around as there are at least 2 "oh shit!" bubbles (AI and unregulated car loans) plus quite a lot of smaller bubbles (such as realestate), the risk is that after any of the big bubbles explodes, via mechanisms such as the one I describe above the other big one is triggered and explodes next and then that in turn blows a bunch of the smaller ones.
Imagine the chaos after the various over-indebtness bubbles blow (not just car loans, but also things like the highest level of credit card debt since 2007), the AI bubble blows and the realestate bubble blows.
The combination of two bubbles - overindebtness and banking overextending on loans, mainly via unregulated second-hand car loaning companies AND the AI one - blowing at the same time (or one blowing and causing the other to also blow as a consequence) is the really scary stuff:
It would basically be a smaller version of the 2008 Finance Industry Crash TOGETHER with a larger version of the 2000 Tech Crash.
Where can we park our investments if we don’t believe in A I?
International markets might be worth looking into. Or bonds.
Europe