this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2025
421 points (99.5% liked)

Privacy

7673 readers
223 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Suoko@feddit.it 20 points 1 month ago (3 children)

If all parents checked their children device just a bit... I'm struggling to block some yt channels now for example either via DNS or family link, but there's no way. Help parents do these kind of things instead of letting govs go the privacy breach way to make us dumb citizens.

[–] justsomeguy@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago

This has nothing to do with children. It's a proposal by technologically inept people who argue that encryption needs to be removed but encryption is so basic that it isn't really feasible to do so. You can make the access harder but that is only an issue for your average joe. Individuals with criminal energy who this is supposed to be about will continue to encrypt their communication while regular users will give up their privacy.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I don’t think you can block YouTube channels via DNS.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

insert joke about the OSI model

[–] Bo7a@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] GreenMartian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Are you stupid? There's no layer...
...oh I see.

[–] Suoko@feddit.it 2 points 1 month ago

Yes, I'd rather call it the Ötzi model

[–] Suoko@feddit.it 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

DNS should allow us to create a blacklist of sites, it would avoid to trash our phone CPU for some useless antivirus, family link (and I guess other MDM) is already enough. If not the DNS, then family link itself.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

But a YouTube “channel” is an application/service specific concept, not exposed in any way dns would be aware of.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Help parents do these kind of things

No offense to parents of Lemmy and I am not generalising too much, but in my experience, many parents are lazy. I'm sure you'd have heard from your own parents or another the expression "didn't they teach you that in school?" Parents pass on the responsibility to someone else who have their own social boundaries when it comes to teaching children.

[–] Suoko@feddit.it 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's why I try to push ChromeOS and family link so much, it's the only 100% good thing Google created for free, both for school and family mdm. And once they're e 18 they'll be free to roam with MS, apple, Linux or whatever they want

[–] brainscan@piefed.zip 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I promote Linux in my family, Signal for chat. Selfhosted Immich for pictures. This the right way to teach my kids.

[–] Suoko@feddit.it 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's your way, I tried with fluffy chat and goto social

[–] brainscan@piefed.zip 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The problem with niche social media platforms like this is that your friends don't use them, so you end up using it in a kind of vacuum.

[–] Suoko@feddit.it 1 points 1 month ago

Which is appealing when you have your friends and you want to have fun with them without chat control and Sauron watching your fart-like messages