this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
294 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

11683 readers
569 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zacpod@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (7 children)

Show your work, please. I'm pretty sure it's closer to 25-30%.

Edit: confirmed. I did the math. It's closer to 35% for most people. Including income tax, sales tax, and property tax.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (6 children)

Many middle class Canadian pay 25% or more just in income tax. Then you have to add sales taxes, property taxes, and the rest.

I would say he is about right.

The top income tax bracket is over 50%. If you are very high income, you can pay well over 30% just in income tax (overall).

For anybody that does not understand progressive income tax brackets, a top rate of 50% does not mean you pay 50% on all income. You pay nothing to a certain point, pay a lower percentage up to a certain level, and then it goes up on what you make beyond that level. On the 30,000th dollar you make, you might pay 25 cents tax. On the 200,000th dollar, you might pay 53 cents. On your first dollar, you pay nothing.

[–] figjam@midwest.social 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Oh no! Won't someone think about the highest earners! #clutchpearls

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago

Sorry to have not gotten back to this.

I did not advocate for high earners (or for anybody actually). Your comment has nothing to do with mine.

I made no value judgements at all, did not take a political side, and I certainly did not clutch any pearls.

What I said, and tried to demonstrate, is that a statement (a mathematical calculation - not an opinion) was reasonably accurate.

I do advocate for accuracy and rationality though. Fact free politics bothers me (no matter the source or the target). So, your comment would certainly make me reach for my pearls if I had any.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)