this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
-61 points (38.9% liked)

/0 Governance

249 readers
144 users here now

A community for discussion and democratic decision making in the Divisions by zero.

Anyone with voting rights can open a governance thread and initiate a vote or a discussion. There's no special keywords you must be aware of before you open a thread, but there are some. here's the governance thread manual.

Answers

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Update: Although we officially still have a few days remaining on this vote, it seems clear that this proposal won't be voted in.

Thanks to everyone for their feedback and votes! I had expected a split vote on this one and it turned out around 1/3 for the proposal and 2/3 against, so that is a quite emphatic no! And of course, we will respect the vote.

I hope we can maybe revisit our instance blocking policies more generally after lemmy has properly working per-user instance blocks, as some folks commented as it will open up more options for personal choice. For example, we could keep a list of sanctioned instances (like csam site) as it works now, but maintain a separate list of "use with caution" instances (aka hesitations in fediseer) that are blocked by default in each user's personal blocklist. But now users could choose to enable those sites for themselves if they wanted to.

For me, that seems like the best overall solution for user choice, and for the new user experience. But it may not sound good to you folks, so that's why we have the voting system in place so we can get quality feedback and also hopefully generate ideas for improvements that will benefit the community.

On that note, anyone can contact me or any of the site admins if they have a proposal they want to appear here on the governance community, and we'll be happy to help you out.

Unruffled


Hi mateys. I'm gonna keep this short and sweet because I don't really have any skin in the game on this one. I am in fact quite happy to leave this decision up to the wider dbzer0 community. On that note, please do not comment on this post unless you are a dbzer0 user - we'd prefer not to have anyone else weighing in.

This post isn't to convince anyone to re-federate or otherwise. In fact, our admin team genuinely doesn't know for sure what our community sentiment is on the topic, or whether or not it's worth a try. My guess is that the community will be quite divided on the topic, as many users are on the topic of hexbear. But the only way to find out for sure is to ask you, so here we are.

But I will say that for me personally, although we still have the occasional drama, and despite past run-ins, I have slowly grown to appreciate having some hexbear users around to help balance out all the turbolibs. While I think its fair to say our instance and theirs will never see eye-to-eye on certain topics, we have coexisted with them in relative calm over the past 12 months. If we can achieve ~~harmony~~a ceasefire with hexbear, then maybe we could do the same with lemmygrad?

I'd also prefer our users to make their own choices with regard to instance blocking of leftist sites in particular.

Obviously there will be some folks here that will hate this idea, and some who think it is worth a try and/or would like to make their own choices with regards to blocking. All I will ask is that you go have a look at lemmygrad.ml before you vote, and ask yourself if there is anything posted there you think warrants keeping them defederated?

Because this might be a divisive topic, I'm setting the threshold for this proposal succeeding at >66.6% majority rather than the default >50% so that there is a clear mandate.

The proposal is as follows:

That dbzer0 removes lemmygrad.ml from our blocked instances list for a 1-month trial period. Another vote will then be conducted to either federate permanently or to reinstate the instance block.

Notes

  • AFAIK none of our admins have discussed this with lemmygrad prior to this post, so we don't know how they will respond, even if this vote succeeds. But having just checked, we are not currently blocked from their end, so in theory re-federating will be a straightforward process (at least technically).
  • We really don't want to cause a big rift in our instance over this, so please there is really no need to get into heated arguments (I mean, what are the chances? Lol). Your vote is what counts most and we will commit to be guided by the voting outcome.
  • If this vote succeeds we will reach out to their admins to see if we can come to some mutual agreement about reintegrating our communities while hopefully keeping conflict to a minimum. Having said that, some conflict is probably inevitable ngl. But I think we will be able to ride it out ok.
  • I've covered a lot of concerns and talked about conflict a lot, so I'll just add that the big positive of re-federating is that there will be a ton of new users and content to interact with, which will hopefully add to the Lemmy experience for our users if the proposal is voted in.

expiry: 7

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] div0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 7 minutes ago) (3 children)

Acknowledged governance topic opened by https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/u/flatworm7591 Early Bird: a parrot, orangered colors Jolly Roger: an icon of pirate jolly roger skull wearing a hat, in orange-red, black and white colors A book with a loaf of bread in the cover  in orange-red, black and white colors Deck Hand: An icon of anchor crossed with two staves in orange-red, black and white colors First Mate: a pirate ship's steering wheel, orangered color

This is a simple majority vote. The current tally is as follows:

  • For: First Mate: a pirate ship's steering wheel, orangered color Vouched: a minimalist compass icon. Orangered color Powder Monkey: An icon of powder barrel in orange-red, black and white colors Vouched: a minimalist compass icon. Orangered color First Mate: a pirate ship's steering wheel, orangered color Vouched: a minimalist compass icon. Orangered color First Mate: a pirate ship's steering wheel, orangered color
  • Against: Vouched: a minimalist compass icon. Orangered color (2), MVP: a star icon, in orange-red, black and white colors (2), Deck Hand: An icon of anchor crossed with two staves in orange-red, black and white colors (4), Threadiverse Enjoyer: An icon of a doubloon with a black hole in the center in orange-red, black and white colors (3), Powder Monkey: An icon of powder barrel in orange-red, black and white colors (1), First Mate: a pirate ship's steering wheel, orangered color (1)
  • Local Community: -0.6
  • Outsider sentiment: Positive
  • Total: -6.6
  • Percentage: 33.00%

This vote will complete in 5 days


Reminder that this is a pilot process and results of voting are not set in stone.

[โ€“] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

how the heck am i supposed to read this somebody help ๐Ÿ˜ญ

[โ€“] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Top just says who opened the topic, and below it the type of the vote (there are discussions and simpje voting)

Each user has a relevant flair, like admin/donator/etc. The 'for' tells the total of all the relevant users flairs (not everybody has flairs!)

The against is the same thing but with downvotes.

Local community / total? I have no idea lol

Percentage is the ratio of upvotes against downvotes (only counts votes from dbzer0 users)

Outsider perspective is the same but for non dbzer0 users, and doesn't show a percentage.

The rest just tells when the vote ends and a footnote

[โ€“] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

"local community" is dbzer0 users who don't get an individual vote as they're not supported or vouched for, but are tallied together at a 1/10 ratio.

"total" is the absolute for minus against tally.

[โ€“] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Noob question, but do I have to add a top-level comment to get my vote accounted with my flair, or is that done automatically by the bot without having to comment?

[โ€“] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[โ€“] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Welcome to lemmy culture! Actually I have no idea either so we'll learn this together!

[โ€“] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

This is all explained in the sidebar links

[โ€“] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

For an exact tally at 2025-07-17 14:40 UTC:

Internal: 80 for, 140 against
Outside: 37 for, 19 against
This info is from gregtech.eu I think, with 16 upvotes and 0 downvotes unaccounted for from defederated instances like .ml and hexbear (hexbear has downvotes disabled).

The huge negative total is from the supporter votes.

As an aside, I think when one of the tallies of "For" or "Against" has enough votes to turn from a list to a bucket-list (i.e. object and number of occurrences, not a list of objects with repeats), then the other should do the same. Else it's a bit confusing to read.