this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
373 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

72732 readers
1425 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] errer@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yeah but a Claude/Cursor/whatever subscription costs $20/month and a junior engineer costs real money. Are the tools 400 times less useful than a junior engineer? I’m not so sure…

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 16 points 1 day ago

The point is that comparing AI tools to junior engineers is ridiculous in the first place. It is simply marketing.

[–] finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This line of thought is short sighted. Your senior engineers will eventually retire or leave the company. If everyone replaces junior engineers with ai, then there will be nobody with the experience to fill those empty seats. Then you end up with no junior engineers and no senior engineers, so who is wrangling the ai?

[–] errer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

This isn’t black and white. There will always be some junior hires. No one is saying replace ALL of them. But hiring 1 junior engineer instead of 3? Maybe…and that’s already happening to some degree.

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Even at $100/month you’re comparing to a > $10k/month junior. 1% of the cost for certainly > 1% functionality of a junior.

You can see why companies are tripping over themselves to push this new modality.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was just ballparking the salary. Say it’s only 100x. Does the argument change? It’s a lot more money to pay for a real person.

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wasn’t it clear that our comments are in agreement?

[–] errer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)