this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
924 points (98.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

8496 readers
2845 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

I know I'm gonna get shit for this, but I'm someone who always tries to be fair and look at things from all sides so...

I suspect like many things in late stage capitalism, for at least some not insignificant portion of them, it's not much of a choice. I'll lay odds a good number have a hard time getting jobs that pay worth a damn. I wouldn't be surprised if many were ex-cons, for example - which is why they're encouraged to wear masks, because those in charge don't want to allow that fact to be used to "de-legitimize" what they're doing. The "choice" from the agent's perspective is quite possibly do this, or be homeless & hungry. It's more deliberate cattle-herding of the powerless by those at the top.

I'm sure the majority are probably into the job, but I suspect those that are just doing it for lack of options is not a small percentage.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Nah, fuck em.

Plenty of ex cons or people in shitty situations in general do their best to get by without directly harming people, by having or gaining morals and trying to genuinely be a good person.

Taking the path of least resistance in terms of 'career options' just makes you a bully and a coward.

I am a person who has gone homeless and hungry, from being the victim of these kinds of people... I've never hurt anybody, I put up with all the bullshit and paperwork and constant harassment from every member of society that comes along with being homeless, and managed to crawl my way back to not being homeless, and doing PT, and repairing my credit after having my wallet/bank cards/id stolen.

I have infinitely negative sympathy for people who have actually done crimes and then victimize more people out of the mere fear of ending up dispossed.

Fuck, they could just go work on the farms instead, that would be a legitimate line of work, lots of job openings there!

Your logic is horrendous and allows for a society where anyone doing anything shitty for basically any reason can be pearl clutched and crocodile tear'd away by unduly sympathizing with their personal sob story.

You really think you'd feel the same if these ex con neo nazis fucks busted down your door and sent you to GITMO, CECOT, or Alligator Auschwitz, simply on account of your skin being too melinated and you having a foreign sounding last name?

Gimme a break.

You gonna sympathize with their victims? Write an opinion piece from their perspective?

You are doing apologia for the modern Gestapo, that shit didn't fly at Nuremberg, if it flies with you now, you're a fascist apologist.

These motherfuckers looked a job description that read 'You will routinely carry out crimes against humanity' and said 'Hell yeah, sign me up!"

They deserve all the sympathy of the Nazis captured by the Inglorious Basterds, tap tap tap goes the baseball bat.

EDIT: But hey, at least your user name is apt, Sanctimonious Ape.

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And Putin doesn't have a choice either or he will be killed, same with Kim Jong Un and Trump would be in prison if he wasn't a tyrant.

It's always a choice no matter how you try to paint it, stealing from supermarkets to eat is above being an ICE officer morally speaking.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't really get your first paragraph - there's a world of difference in options between those at the top & those at the bottom.

Nonetheless, I agree it's always a choice... to an extent. When you've got others depending upon you to provide, or you're not educated or mature enough to understand what all this means and are just trying to survive - how much of it is really a choice?

I'm not saying they're saints, but I expect at least some of them would rather be doing something else if they could get enough pay for it.

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

or mature enough to understand what all this means and are just trying to survive - how much of it is really a choice?

Then nothing is a choice, everything is a product of your nurture and nature and free will is an illusion

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 20 hours ago

Everything is a product of nurture and nature. Free will is an illusion. Your brain doesn't give a shit.

Also, law and order isn't based on if there were better choices but which choice you chose.

The fact that your choice was based on fate doesn't change the consequences. It doesn't unassault a 70 year women.

nothing is a choice, everything is a product of your nurture and nature and free will is an illusion

I unironically believe this, yet I also believe that all fascists (including ICE, obviously) need their "medicine" (lead)

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There can be a noticeable difference in choices when there's a lack of understanding what that choice means. If Trump getting into office again didn't make that clear, I don't know what to tell you.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I wouldn’t be surprised if many were ex-cons

proudboys, oath keepers and 2%s, of COURSE they were at J6th. so while I agree with the conclusion, I have zero fucking sympathy for their tenuous position. It's probably real hard to keep a job in the real world when you hate everyone.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Yep, I'm sure that's absolutely true for most of them. But it's unlikely to be all of them. If we are to be the better people, then we need to remember not to dehumanize them like they do their victims. Absolutely defend yourself (or whoever they're after if you're up for putting yourself in harm's way), but no more than necessary, or you will be no better than them.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

I initially misread this as 'we shouldn't dehumanize proudboys/oath chuds etc' and was like: goddamn this mofo wants me to be jesus

upon rereading: don't assume all the ice-wads are pb/oathkeeper/derp%ers - which is still pretty fucking generous in my viewing; yeah, people just doing a job, but also, that was tried for the defense at Nuremburg - didn't fly there either.

[–] NJSpradlin@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s always been class warfare. The rich and powerful subjugate the poor, and hold poverty over us to ensure that we do what they want, and we hate who they want us to hate.

Us infighting doesn’t stop the ultra-wealthy from continuing to win, it enables them to. The only way to win is to band together as a people regardless of our race, status, or job, against them.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Fully agreed. The problem is getting that to happen - particularly when they own the bulk of the media from which so many of us "commoners" get what passes for "information." Never mind overcoming the long-ingrained tribalism keeping the infighting going so strong.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Interesting read, but there wasn't even one vaguely sympathetic applicant among them? Don't you find that the teeniest bit unlikely?

The slant of the article was so blatant and obvious. For example, the one who claimed he wrote papers in college about "the harms of illegals in America" wasn't asked further about those papers? Riiggghhhhtttt. Either this was an incompetent interviewer, or they had a bias they wanted to confirm when writing this article.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I can see where you’re coming from, so I started reading the article. But most of what we need to know is right at the top. It was published less than a month ago, and the job fair described was also in June of 2025.

I really don’t expect the people applying for ICE jobs right now have a large percentage of sympathetic characters among them. I would expect there to be some, of course, but not finding any in a random sample doesn’t feel very noteworthy to me.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Oh, I've little doubt of that myself. I acknowledged the majority of them were into it in my very first comment, and they're definitely mostly assholes. Although I try to remember there's reasons they became that way, I still am not foolish enough to think they're easily redeemable. However, I would be quite surprised if there weren't some not insignificant percentage of their staff who are just in it for the easy job that pays reasonably well because they have few other options to survive. There's always outliers in any grouping - always.

That's all I wanted to point out - the fact there are still humans behind those masks with a wide variety of backgrounds. This is something that people too easily drop as a factor when making judgements about others. The fact you personally don't find that "newsworthy" doesn't mean others don't need to be reminded of that fact. Just look at all the vitriol based upon exceedingly large and false assumptions about who I am that I've received here alone.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I just want to reply that this

Although I try to remember there's reasons they became that way, I still am not foolish enough to think they're easily redeemable.

and this

That's all I wanted to point out - the fact there are still humans behind those masks with a wide variety of backgrounds. This is something that people too easily drop as a factor when making judgements about others.

both hit home for me. I was born into the white religious conservative world. And when I was younger, more naive, and of course much angrier, some of the hollow rhetoric on the right seemed to make sense.

So when looking at some of these awful people out there, it can be a very “there but for the grace of god go I” situation for me. And their humanity deserves that benefit of the doubt.

However, the very unfortunate reality is that every villain has a sad story. I mean, imagine being raised by a monster like Frederick Christ Trump Sr.

So yeah I try to remember that my ignorant conservative relatives didn’t exactly get shown all the truths in the universe and still chose bigotry over community. They have a warped view of the world for various reasons.

But on the other side of that coin, the sad ubiquity of heartbreaking stories can’t keep people from fighting back when appropriate.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 1 points 17 hours ago

It's that "when appropriate" which is key, along with "in an appropriate manner." I absolutely support resisting these thugs (& this "administration" in general), but I fear in the heat of anger it's all too easy to dehumanize them, which makes our side no better than theirs. Often they even deliberately try to provoke such a response so they are "legally justified" in going over the top in "defending themselves." It's a tedious & difficult game to come out ahead on. I feel it helps one restrain emotions and keep from reacting to their provocations if one always tries to keep in mind that their opponent is just as human as we are. Be resolute in resistance, but not violent unless you have absolutely no other choice.