this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
70 points (87.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

33114 readers
2903 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If any of you lovely shitposters have the same for instagram and tik tok my homies in discord¹ will be very pleased

¹ Yes I try to bring them into Matrix or Lemmy but it is not that easy

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ipitco@lemmybefree.net 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Now let’s create drama

Let’s do the same for lemmy instances 👀

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

.ml, hexbear and grad up left

Rest down left

Gonna be the most boring one :D

Lemmy.world, sh.itjust.works and Feddit.org are the most centrist ones probably. They’re like liberal leftism while the rest of lemmy tends to be explicitly anti-capitalist.

[–] ipitco@lemmybefree.net 2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

blahaj up left

I have the feeling that db0 is down right

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Blahaj is explicitly anti-tankie. I mean look at the banner of !onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone, so they are clearly lib left.

Whilst dbzer0 is literally explicitly anti-capitalist.

So both of those go lib left. Perhaps dbzer0 more lib and blahaj more left.

[–] ipitco@lemmybefree.net 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

blahaj is authoritarian. Them not liking tankies doesn't mean they're not the exact same with their ideas. Ada is a perfect example of this.

!196@lemmy.world doesn't exist for no reason

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Youre mixing up moderation style and political ideology.

Blahaj is moderated to be a safe space for trans people. That means they remove anything remotely insulting or harmful. That’s their moderation policy. That doesn’t mean their political views are authoritarian.

[–] ipitco@lemmybefree.net 0 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

both are often linked

Enforcing your opinion while banning people not agreeing is pretty authoritarian to me

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Do you not understand the concept of a safe space?

When you’re literally one of the most politically targeted groups and create a community the point might not be to make it a “free speech zone” but the one place on the internet you feel safe.

That doesn’t make them authoritarian politically. They’re just admins following through on a vision. Where people can freely join their instance or not. Not politicians enforcing their views on people who didn’t consent to it.

Blahaj doesn’t pretend to be a neutral instance like lemmy.ml does. It’s explicit.

[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 2 points 20 hours ago

Correct. We currently have some sentiment against liberal spaces and DEI programs and so on. And some people think it's the war against straight white men. But having a men's groups or women's groups or safe-spaces to talk freely about whatever topics isn't authoritarian. The opposite of it is equally true. You can't discuss certain topics without the correct space for it, and not allowing them to discuss how they like is authoritatian as well!

[–] ipitco@lemmybefree.net 1 points 20 hours ago

It ends up more as an opinion circlejerk than a safe space.

When you ban people disagreeing with you, you're not making anyone feel safer, you're just comforting yourself in a confirmation bias group where only one voice can be heard

When you ban people by stating they're transphobic when they're not, you're being authoritarian and misleading. It ends up with active misinformation because either you're with them, or you must fuck off. A sect.

When the concept of a safe space goes from no judgment and kindness to a political space, I believe it will have a negative impact.

But maybe it's just me being pissed off at the abusive moderation

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Absolutely not. libright would be something like communick

[–] ipitco@lemmybefree.net 1 points 22 hours ago

I don’t know this one, worth checking out?

[–] Walk_blesseD@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Politically illiterate comment

[–] ipitco@lemmybefree.net 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

for db0 it might be as frankly I don't know, it was just a feeling that I have, that they're more open towards liberalism

But for blahaj, up left seems like the correct spot

Woke, pro freedom of gender/identity, progressive; so most of the time left

Authoritarian, huge voice, strict on voicing their opinions and rules on the subject. You either agree or you're banned. So authoritarian

[–] jackr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Hey, we are an anarchist instance, not "anarcho"capitalist. (Look at db0's blog, he might be an ai shill but he's not an ancap)

[–] ipitco@lemmybefree.net 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

So you’re at the bottom 🤔, but where on the horizontal axis is to be guessed

[–] jackr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

We're on the left. The only anarchism is social anarchism.

[–] ipitco@lemmybefree.net 0 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] jackr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I mean... can you really call it anarchism if you have a n implicit hierarchy? I would say that defeats the point.

[–] ipitco@lemmybefree.net 0 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Income inequalities don't implicitly imply a hierarchy in terms of authority over other people

Anarchism mainly rejects the state's hierarchy. It doesn't make it left or right

Also knowing that left and right will often rely on the state to push their ideas and rules

[–] jackr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Anarchism in it's correct interpretation rejects all hierarchies, be it from the state, white supremacy, the patriarchy or capitalism. Since money is equivalent to power income inequality does inherently imply a hierarchy.

[–] ipitco@lemmybefree.net 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The wikipedia definition doesn't seem to agree with what you're saying.

[–] jackr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

That's not really a valid argument, as wikipedia is descriptive, not prescriptive. But besides that, yes it does?

[–] ipitco@lemmybefree.net 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I still fail to see how anarchism inherently wants to make salaries and income more even

That’s an extension that belongs to a branch of anarchism, it is not supposed to be like this by definition

[–] jackr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 13 hours ago

Anarchism wants to do away with salaries altogether in most cases. Anarchism is about increasing freedom, meaning the ability for an individual to take the actions they want to take. A part of this is ensuring no person is dying of starvation/living on the street/etc.