this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
753 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

72732 readers
1570 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wosat@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (9 children)

I don't disagree with the criticisms of American cars -- overpriced, uninspired, unreliable, over-engineered, etc. -- but to everyone saying "we should just compete", do you realize the realities that Chinese workers experience? Have you heard of 996? It's shorthand for a common work schedule in China: 9am to 9pm, 6 days a week. Benefits that are common in the U.S., even in non-union shops, like retirement plans, PTO, worker's comp, and overtime pay are rare. So, yeah, things can be made much cheaper if you are willing to feed your workforce into the grinder.

[–] jarmitage@mander.xyz 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And that’s exactly what is coming to the US, since they think workers rights and unions are the problem.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world -4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

LOL what workers rights do you clowns in the US have?

[–] TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Not an American, but it's worth saying that despite their labour market's galling shortfalls, they don't have a culture of 12 hour days for 6 days per week. Many work much less, and those who do pull those kinds of hours are typically tradesmen/women who make pretty good bank. Those types of jobs are being systematically eliminated by corporations, but I digress.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

PSA @Bloomcole@lemmy.world is a troll.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

PSA this InternetCitizen2 is a troll.
Askfor a source and this clown gives you this:
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-47934513
LOL

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago

"12 hour days for 6 days per week. "
So you believe this baseless garbage statement that Chinese generally have these work hours? Right.
If you compare it to nonsense then the US is less bad, but those are not the facts.
retirement age 63 years old for men, 58 years for women, US: 67/66
paid holidays, not even a right, they maybe get 6, China:13
US: no paid sick days, China: they get 100% to 60%
The US is a joke.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So we should then let American oligarchs drive American workers to the same but slower? because that is what has happened so far

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

That is certainly their wet dream, now that they can't easily just move their manufacturing to China and reap all of the benefits like they could 70s - 90s.

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I will strongly disagree with “over engineered”. Why a car company with all their money and bailouts that they can’t compete with Apple/Android on touchscreen features and responsiveness is the whole reason why Chinese cars will kill American car companies. Chinese cars support Android auto even when Google play services isn’t even available in China (last I checked).

[–] wosat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Okay, I'll concede that point to you. U.S. carmakers suck at software. And, even on the hardware, they're resistant to change and slow to innovate.

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Software is the answer to many of the mechanical issues too though. Granted, the physical engineering is definitely over engineered, but would they really need to have 6 different taillight frames when LEDs can be multicolor and just tuned with software for each market? I also see zero reason why manufacturers can’t start from a base and tweak for different market configurations. You also see car companies complain about complex regulation, but then in this day and age when east Asia can make you anything, that’s not an excuse I’m willing to be fed. I fucking hate Elmo like everyone else here, but why the hell is the Model Y the most popular car in the world. None of the other companies want to copy Tesla? They don’t want to compete? We’ve gotten to the point where it’s ludicrous that they’re not competing.

[–] pup_atlas@pawb.social 6 points 2 days ago

I’m not sure I see a connection between the working conditions, and the quality of the car. I don’t think anyone is advocating for adopting those bad conditions, but they also seem unrelated to the quality of design, and parts that go into it. That purely seems like a question of paying for good high-quality parts, and not skimping out on the design phase.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Have you heard of 996? It’s shorthand for a common work schedule in China: 9am to 9pm, 6 days a week

So a typical American teacher’s schedule?

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

but to everyone saying “we should just compete”, do you realize the realities that Chinese workers experience? Have you heard of 996?

I get what you are saying, but sometimes I think we should in a way, or at least we should get republicans exposed to it, so they can live their hogwash ideas of free markets.

It won't be them living the reality though, it will be their subordinates and employees. The same ones already being crushed to death by production metrics, stagnation of wages and inflation. The people involved in these decision making processes are too well shielded from the actual consequences, beyond maybe driving past and seeing the ruins of what used to be towns/cities/neighbourhoods destroyed by the free market and social policies.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Exactly, which is why I'm left scratching my head why the US wants to bring manufacturing back to the US. We're much better of growing the well-paying jobs where our education systems can compete favorably vs bringing back jobs that compete with low-paying jobs...

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

where our education systems can compete favorably

LOL are you sure about that?

https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/the-highest-literacy-rates-in-the-world.html

China ranks higher than the USA in literacy rates

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sure, but the US has a lot of well-educated people (e.g. see the Education Index), as well as a lot of opportunities for well-educated people to get in-demand jobs that pay well.

Literacy rates are interesting, but they don't translate to well-paying jobs like education attainment rates.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Sure, but the US has a lot of well-educated people (e.g. see the Education Index), as well as a lot of opportunities for well-educated people to get in-demand jobs that pay well.

There are more Indian Engineers in the USA than American ones... and Trump is destroying all of it

The way things are going for you, nobody with a half a choice would decide to migrate to the USA for work

Right, and that's completely brain-dead. We should be wanting to attract more talent, because more people able to take high-end jobs usually ends up creating more high-end jobs. We want more immigrant engineers, doctors, etc, because that encourages greater investment since the labor pool is deeper.

But no, we'll instead block cheap imports and encourage more blue-collar work, and if we take that too far, we'll end up in a similar situation as we did back in the Great Depression when demand just evaporates.

We should let developing countries develop and focus on what developed countries are better at: innovation. Attract top talent and keep investment dollars flowing so the R&D jobs stay.

[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, what is the reason those Indian engineers chose the US over India?

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

and Trump is destroying all of it

The way things are going for you, nobody with a half a choice would decide to migrate to the USA for work

Adjust to your new reality pal

Well yes, but actually no. BYD has quite of an advantage (also because China subsidies it), but american (and also European) companies have no incentive to actually design good quality products if BYD gets left out. At the same time CEO will try (and currently do it) to force us into working more and more for less money with less benefits while swimming in billions of dollars.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

So then why do so many US companies have the CSRs in places overseas ? And manufacturing overseas ?

Why did so many US companies decide to utilize those working conditions for labor for US companies ?