this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
218 points (99.1% liked)

Programmer Humor

24772 readers
881 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kamikazerusher@lemmy.world 16 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

This is my experience every time I return to learning rust. I’m guessing that if I used it more often than once a quarter with hobby projects I’d stop falling into the same traps.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I find that the error messages themselves are a great tool for learning when it comes to Rust.

[–] kamikazerusher@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

Eh, I’m not entirely sold on that idea.

I think they do a good job of pointing out “this is a behavior/feature of Rust you need to understand.” However they can send you down the wrong path of correction.

The compiler error mentioning static lifetime specifiers of &str demonstrates both. It indicates to the developer that ownership and scopes will play a significant role when defining and accessing data. The error though will guide them towards researching how to define static lifetimes and possibly believe that they will need to set this in their functions and structs. Each time you look at questions about this error in places like Stack Overflow with example code you’ll find suggested solutions explaining that a manually-defined static lifetime isn’t necessary to resolve the problem.