this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
1640 points (99.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

12448 readers
439 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LaterRedditor@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Wouldn't it be way easier to implement self driving on a rail system? The trains I take to work are frequently cancelled due to lack of operators.

[–] RadioFreeArabia@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Yes, there are plenty of driverless train networks around the world.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_driverless_train_systems

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Not really, because existing track would need to be retrofitted with all of the sensors and whatnot specific to automation. Then there would still need to be a large number of staff available to reroute trains when some run late or have issues, because trying to predict all of those situations is impossible.

Smaller rail systems are frequently automated, like light rail at airports and even some subway systems where minimal human oversight is enough to handle it when things don't work perfectly.

The shortage of operators has a lot more to do with intentionally trying to ruin rail by cutting funding and putting in barriers to working. There are a ton of people who would enjoy being operators if it paid well and was a reliable position.

[–] Baggie@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago

We have a metro in Sydney that does this. It's usually pretty alright, but difficult to build and scale. The lines that actually go out of the city would never be able to achieve such things, the construction and setup alone is astronomical.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -2 points 3 days ago

Wouldn’t it be way easier to implement self driving on a rail system?

No, because you still need to put all those parked personal vehicles somewhere. Shared physical infrastructure reduces overhead.