this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
904 points (95.0% liked)

tumblr

4674 readers
28 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] entwine413@lemm.ee 58 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The fact that bad shit is normalized isn't a great argument in this instance.

[–] themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works 52 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yes it is. The argument is that people having a moral panic over kids getting gender affirming care (which they erroneously believe to be bottom surgery, that's another can of worms), which is shown to be safe and effective, are not having the same moral panic (and even are likely to be the same demographic enabling this behaviour) over actual, proven to be a disaster for your health activities, shows that all these people are simply transphobes.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not transphobic to recognize a bad argument against trans hate. There are plenty of good arguments against it

[–] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Where transhobes do and do not direct their attention betrays their motivations.

Their motivations are very important.

The OP comment is not anti-transitioning, nor pro-child-meth.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I am trying, but I literally cannot think of a way to be more direct here.

The transphobe's hypocrisy is being used here as evidence of their lack of sincerity. i.e., they're conning people. They are conmen. Liars and cheats who believe whatever they have to to convince people to hate the gays too. They will constantly contradict themselves because they don't care about consistency. The irrational fear that they feel is the only consistent position they hold. And so, they don't care about children's causes because they aren't motivated by children's causes.

I know that you already know this; I'm not trying to be condescending. What I think is that you are, like, debate-tricking yourself into disagreeing with something really easily understood by most people.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We are just talking about two different things. I took the first response to the top level comment to be saying the top level comment was transphobic. Which I was disagreeing with

I suppose. I mean, I was reacting to the suggestion that it was indeed a bad argument.

For what it's worth, I do only see themoonisacheese saying that anti-transitioners are being transphobic.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Except it's a strawman. Plenty of people are upset about over medication of children. As one of those children, kindly STFU and don't speak for us.

[–] Zenith@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah I’m reading this and I’m like “I’m actually very much against both of these examples…..” the sports shit with kids in general is insane and it’s just to help them stand out for capitalism reasons, which is also why mainstream people don’t see anything wrong with it, capitalism has footed the bill of normalizing genuinely bad things like turning kids sports from a fun way to make friends to a literal job with overbearing schedules and physically inappropriate levels of activity for young bodies and joints.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

You're supposed to not agree with these (mostly). The point is people who are against gender affirming care usually aren't against them. They'll make the argument it's about "protecting the children" when it benefits them, but they're really just reactionary conservatives who want to maintain the status quo. The status quo supports the two things in the OP, but is against gender affirming care, despite gender affirming care having large upsides and the other not as much.

As one of those children, have you witnessed fetishising of people who have had puberty blockers? Or is that class of predator rare and without influence?

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

As one of those children

Hey, just a heads up that admitting you are a minor online isn't a good idea for lots of reasons, and that a number of lemmy instances will ban you for it (as they're officially 16 or 18+ by instance rules) rather than accepting having to deal with all the various complicated laws about handling the data of underage users.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I was one of those children, Einstein. Think about how old I would have to be to be one of the overly medicated ADHD kids when that mostly happened in the 90s and early 2000s.

Get your white knight ass out of here.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Don't come at me for missing context you didn't include. You said nothing about the over medication of ADHD in your comment.

It's right there. You can check it.

I'm sorry they didn't hold you back enough for you to learn proper communication or emotional regulation. That must be tough.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Maybe don't assume and give someone a lecture when it's not your place to do so in the first place. Maybe you can go fuck yourself instead of trying to psychoanalyze someone you don't even know and thinking that them being offended by it is proof of your superiority.

Also, scroll up and maybe you'll see us talking about giving meth to children, aka Ritalin for ADHD. Maybe read the whole conversation.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, there is discussion about ADHD, but none of that is part of this particular comment chain. It's not tough to go "show context" all the way up to the top level comment in this thread, and it's not anywhere between here and there. The only context in this thread is overmedication of children, and ADHD is not the only situation where that happens.

And as far as "lecturing" goes? You blew up over a single sentence. It's a run on, so we can call it three sentences, whatever.

Also, I didn't "psychoanalyze" you until you aggressively brought your own neurodivergence into the mix. Spoiler alert: I'm also one of those 90s-00s overmedicated ADHD kids. I'm calling out your personal lacking in emotional regulation because I have personal experience with it as well, and it's obvious as shit.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Let me just be blunt: I don't owe you shit. You don't like it, stop responding. Maybe next time don't try to police someone else and then get annoyed when they tell you to fuck off.

It's not your job or responsibility and acting like you can is what makes me think you're a douche and treat you accordingly. You want out of this? Go away.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Lol, are you kidding me? How magnanimous of you to give me permission to disengage. Thank you so much.

You're the one who came out guns blazing against someone trying to be helpful. Again, it's the internet, different social dynamic than irl for random strangers offering advice. Don't want responses? Don't comment.

Then you kept trying to make weak shit excuses and justifications that I missed context that literally isn't part of this comment thread. You don't get the high ground on this.

Enjoy the block.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Shhhhhhh. Only dreams now. I didn't read a word you said. I told you, I don't care little man.

[–] themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 weeks ago

...holy waffle tweet moment batman

[–] amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone -5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

you missed the point. children can give informed consent to things that might prove harmful down the line, like ballet.

not so much for ADHD meds, because parents often force these on them to make them compliant and as punishment.

there is no medication without side effects. ADHD meds can have bad consequences, but we should still allow people to take them based on informed consent. apply the same logic to kids on HRT.

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 41 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I hate to break it to you about how many children are forced to do things like youth football and youth ballet...

Children can give informed consent? We've agreed pretty unilaterally as a society that that is fundamentally untrue. Especially at the ages where children are taken to ballet classes.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This thread is about kids medically transitioning, by the time they’re undergoing puberty they’re teens or preteens. Not like six year olds who want to do ballet or whatever.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

The point is people will allow (force) their children to do ballet, even at young ages, despite the consequences. Those same people will also say that older children can't consent to gender affirming care. It's hypocracy.

[–] Zenith@lemm.ee -2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

If kids can give informed consent doesn’t the entire argument for not fucking kids cause they can’t consent go right out the window? I do not believe kids can give informed consent because they don’t have the capacity, context or knowledge to foresee the consequences of their actions

Personally as a nearly 40 year old I would be horrified by 12 year old me making irreversible life changes for current me

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 weeks ago

If kids can give informed consent doesn’t the entire argument for not fucking kids cause they can’t consent go right out the window?

What is with people being absolutely unable to reconcile ‘children should have some input over their own healthcare decisions, actually’ with ‘grown adults should not be able to sexually prey on children’?

Knowing your gender is so different to having sex that I’m having trouble believing anyone is bringing it up sincerely.

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

12 year old you (unknowingly) made the irreversible life change of going through the default puberty. Plenty of people regret making that choice.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

there is no medication without side effects. ADHD meds can have bad consequences, but we should still allow people to take them based on informed consent. apply the same logic to kids on HRT.

People aren't put on ADHD medications or on hormone therapy because of any ability of informed consent. They are prescribed because a medical professional has evaluated that the outcome of their overall health with treatment is improved when compared to not being treated. The parents and the patient have a say....to a point. However a medical professional can be empowered by the courts to supercede the consent of the PT or the parent if and when deemed necessary.

Medications have the potential of negative side effects, it's not guaranteed. Those potential side effects are weighted against the potential negative effect of inaction.

[–] amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

frankly medical processionals should have no say over whether a trans person gets HRT or not.

they should warn you of what might happen if you have health conditions but frankly those interactions aren't common enough to justify this level of draconian gatekeeping in most societies.

this is why trans people on a DIY regimen often do much better than by asking for "professional" help because most cis doctors are evil, gatekeepers or too ignorant to know what's good for us.

While I don't agree that medical providers shouldn't be involved in important healthcare decisions. Unfortunately, at this point I agree the American healthcare system has largely failed the trans community, among others.

I think medical providers should be doing their jobs and keeping their personal beliefs to themselves. If a patient is wanting to transition they should have access to a provider who can make that transition as easy and safe as possible.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

parents often force these on them to make them compliant and as punishment.

That sentence is doing a LOT of heavy lifting. Why do you believe this?

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't know about them, they may have personal experience, but there was definitely a period in the 90s and 2000s when doctors were prescribing Ritalin as freely as opioids and it was advertised by some as a treatment for hyperactive kids. Kids won't sit still in class? Just pop a pill and watch them become model students!

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ok, so.. you know that happens when you give a normal child a stimulant? The same thing that happens to adults.

If you give a kid Ritalin and they don't bounce off the walls, that's a pretty good indicator they're ADHD and you made the right choice.

I didn't even know that Ritalin was a stimulant. It makes sense as an ADHD med that it would be, but I just knew how easily kids were buying it at school (even middle school, not just high school) because it seemed like practically anyone could get a prescription for it.