this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2025
37 points (100.0% liked)

Formula 1

11167 readers
37 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series


๐Ÿ“† F1 Calendar
๐Ÿ FIA Documents
๐Ÿ“Š F1 Pace


2026 Calendar

Location Date
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡จ Monaco 05-07 Jun
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Spain 12-14 Jun
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น Austria 26-28 Jun
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Great Britain 03-05 Jul
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Belgium 17-19 Jul
๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ Hungary 24-26 Jul
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Netherlands 21-23 Aug
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Italy (Monza) 04-06 Sep
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Barcelona-Catalunya 11-13 Sep
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Azerbaijan 24-26 Sep
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Singapore 09-11 Oct
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ USA (Austin) 23-25 Oct
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Mexico 30 Oct-01 Nov
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Brazil 06-08 Nov
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ USA (Las Vegas) 19-21 Nov
๐Ÿ‡ถ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Qatar 27-29 Nov
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช Abu Dhabi 04-06 Dec

Rules

1. Be respectful.
Treat drivers, teams, and fellow Lemmings with respect. Healthy debate is encouraged, but keep it civil and constructive.

2. No duplicate news.
Please check the feed before posting. Multiple posts from different news companies reporting the exact same thing will be removed to keep the feed clean.

3. Spoilers.
This is a live sports community. We discuss sessions in real-time, so browse at your own risk during race weekends!

4. Make content accessible.
โ€ข Non-English articles: Include a translated summary (e.g., DeepL).
โ€ข Paywalled articles: Provide a brief summary in the comments.

5. Social media.
Post social media updates as screenshots so everyone can view them without needing an account. Always include the original source link.

6. Zero tolerance for spam. Strictly no gambling, crypto, or NFT-related content.


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

ROUND 9: ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Spain


FORMULA 1 ARAMCO GRAN PREMIO DE ESPAร‘A 2025


Circuit stats


  • First Grand Prix: 1991
  • Number of laps: 66
  • Circuit Length: 4.657 km
  • Race Distance: 307.236 km
  • Lap record: 1:16.330 Max Verstappen (2023)
  • 2024 winner: Max Verstappen

Track Map


Image

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] AliSaket@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's funny to read back the thread. It makes it seem as if we disagree, when we clearly agree.

The overtaking rules were recently changed because of the way one driver exploited that set of rules

Yeah. But we don't know how, because they only changed the unpublished guidelines... probably. We can't really know. And you are probably correct that they want to maintain their leeway for nuance or/and manipulation, as can be witnessed nearly every season.

The kicker of this one driver's behavior last season: it's a clear breach of Appendix L Ch.4 2. b), c) and d). But all that has to happen because of that is a reporting to the Stewards. Everything beyond that is - by the rules we have access to - fully up to them. That's all I'm trying to say. The actual rules don't just offer grey areas, they lack any enforcement. It's like if the lotg say, that if the ref sees a foul, he can do as he pleases. And these problems and discussions won't cease until there are clear limits within the rules and guidelines and the public can finally see them. It doesn't mean they shouldn't allow for nuance, but this is just ridiculously arbitrary.

[โ€“] tankplanker@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It has to be entirely intentional to keep it opaque and ambiguous, it will not change until they are forced to change it.

t has to be intentional because the FIA know that any such ambiguity or lack of clarity in the rules governing the design of the car are ruthlessly exploited by the teams as soon as they are spotted, and the FIA often react quickly to it with TDs and the like, why should drivers be any different?

With football refs if the ref does something so obviously wrong and it results in a result being changed, that ref is at real risk of punishment of one sort or another. Its rare that we ever see that with F1 stewards, Herbert was the last guy to get punished and that was for talking outside of school rather than a mistake with a particular ruling, as contentious as some of those were.

It just feels like they are equating controversy with rating, so have no incentive to sort it out.