this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2025
37 points (100.0% liked)
Formula 1
10084 readers
7 users here now
Welcome to Formula1 @ lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series
๐ F1 Calendar
๐ FIA Documents
๐ F1 Pace
2025 Calendar
Location | Date |
---|---|
๐จ๐ฆ Canada | 13-15 Jun |
๐ฆ๐น Austria | 27-29 Jun |
๐ฌ๐ง Great Britain | 04-06 Jul |
๐ง๐ช Belgium | 25-27 Jul |
๐ญ๐บ Hungary | 01-03 Aug |
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands | 29-31 Aug |
๐ฎ๐น Italy | 05-07 Sep |
๐ฆ๐ฟ Azerbaijan | 19-21 Sep |
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore | 03-05 Oct |
๐บ๐ธ United States | 17-19 Oct |
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico | 24-26 Oct |
๐ง๐ท Brazil | 07-09 Nov |
๐บ๐ธ United States | 20-22 Nov |
๐ถ๐ฆ Qatar | 28-30 Nov |
๐ฆ๐ช Abu Dhabi | 05-07 Dec |
Rules
- Be respectful to everyone: drivers, lemmings etc
- No gambling, crypto or NFTs
- Spoilers are allowed
- Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
- Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
- Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
- Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but donโt want to become formuladank.
- No duplicate posts, or posts of different news companies that say the same thing.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I would maintain that the uncertainty is intentionally kept in the rules to allow for a flexible interpretation to suit the situation. By itself its not a bad way to do things as it allows for nuance but it also allows for actual and perceived manipulation.
I have long maintained, including in this very thread that I want the uncertainty removed and the rules made stricter. When you have certain drivers deliberately working in the grey area of the rules, while doing nothing "illegal", or you have clearly inconsistent stewarding, is against the intent of allowing that grey area.
The overtaking rules were recently changed because of the way one driver exploited that set of rules, its how it has to be in that situation.
It's funny to read back the thread. It makes it seem as if we disagree, when we clearly agree.
Yeah. But we don't know how, because they only changed the unpublished guidelines... probably. We can't really know. And you are probably correct that they want to maintain their leeway for nuance or/and manipulation, as can be witnessed nearly every season.
The kicker of this one driver's behavior last season: it's a clear breach of Appendix L Ch.4 2. b), c) and d). But all that has to happen because of that is a reporting to the Stewards. Everything beyond that is - by the rules we have access to - fully up to them. That's all I'm trying to say. The actual rules don't just offer grey areas, they lack any enforcement. It's like if the lotg say, that if the ref sees a foul, he can do as he pleases. And these problems and discussions won't cease until there are clear limits within the rules and guidelines and the public can finally see them. It doesn't mean they shouldn't allow for nuance, but this is just ridiculously arbitrary.
It has to be entirely intentional to keep it opaque and ambiguous, it will not change until they are forced to change it.
t has to be intentional because the FIA know that any such ambiguity or lack of clarity in the rules governing the design of the car are ruthlessly exploited by the teams as soon as they are spotted, and the FIA often react quickly to it with TDs and the like, why should drivers be any different?
With football refs if the ref does something so obviously wrong and it results in a result being changed, that ref is at real risk of punishment of one sort or another. Its rare that we ever see that with F1 stewards, Herbert was the last guy to get punished and that was for talking outside of school rather than a mistake with a particular ruling, as contentious as some of those were.
It just feels like they are equating controversy with rating, so have no incentive to sort it out.