this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
725 points (99.2% liked)

News

37724 readers
1572 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Failures uncovered as US health secretary touted ‘gold-standard’ science in health report ordered by Trump team

Robert F Kennedy Jr’s flagship health commission report contains citations to studies that do not exist, according to an investigation by the US publication Notus.

The report exposes glaring scientific failures from a health secretary who earlier this week threatened to ban government scientists from publishing in leading medical journals.

The 73-page “Make America healthy again” report – which was commissioned by the Trump administration to examine the causes of chronic illness, and which Kennedy promoted it as “gold-standard” science backed by more than 500 citations – includes references to seven studies that appear to be entirely invented, and others that the researchers say have been mischaracterized.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Darkard@lemmy.world 244 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Ah, written by ChatGPT then.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 140 points 11 months ago (4 children)

That's exactly what I was thinking. A human doesn't accidentally cite multiple made up studies. So these fuckers are writing government policy by saying "Hey ChatCPT, write a scientific paper with citations about how vaccines are bad."

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 52 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Yeah, humans will cite real studies that don’t say what they claim (either from malice or misunderstanding) or just vaguely say ‘studies say’, not pull an entire citation out of the air.

I’m leaning towards making it illegal to use AI (generative LLM) in government work. All it can do is mislead and introduce errors.

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 33 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Good luck with that. Administration not being allowed to cheat on their homework is a pipe dream at this point.

[–] Blooper@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 11 months ago

this administration

[–] abies_exarchia@lemm.ee 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

My friend, you are going to hate a recent memo from the US Office of Management and Budget titled “Advancing Governance, Innovation, and Risk Management for Agency Use of Artificial Intelligence”

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 11 months ago

Absolutely correct, I do hate it! 🫠

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 26 points 11 months ago (2 children)

And 70% of people will never check to see if those sources are legit. Kinda like how most people just read the headlines.

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago

More like 99.9%

[–] tibi@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Not checking is one thing, but seeing so many people actually dismissing when someone calls out the factual errors is so infuriating. Like not only you are an ignorant dumbfuck who doesn't bother checking the evidence, but you are stupid too and criticize people who point out the glaring flaws and cry out cancel culture. Or, of course, you are an awful person who doesn't care about the truth as long as you get your way.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

ChatCPT

ChatCCP, ChatUSA, Chat$Trump, TruthChat... What will they come up with next!

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

a human might not, but worms will.

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 37 points 11 months ago

I've read three different articles (including the NOTUS one) about this, and none of the alleged "journalists" has the courage to say that these kind of errors are highly symptomatic of LLM generated text. Nobody mentions AI or LLMs even once.

It's like they're so intent on being unbiased, that they can't bring themselves to connect even the most obvious dots for people.


What happened?

Well, the government released this report with lots of weird errors, such as references to scientific research that doesn't exist.

How could that happen?

Shhhhh, no no no. We can't talk about that. We're the news media. We just throw puzzle pieces at the busy people trying to keep their underpaid jobs, raise a family, and make ends meet. We don't help them assemble the pieces into a coherent picture. That would be ludicrous.

[–] KingGordon@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

What's wrong with an em-dash? Do I need to stop using it in my daily writing?

[–] frozen@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 9 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Unironically, yes. LLM generated text is chock-full of em-dashes for some reason. I still use regular dashes to separate clauses occasionally - like this - but not full em-dashes.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago

Ah, glad a single dash is ok - because I use them all the time instead of commas or semi-colons for informal writing.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 11 months ago

Oh no, not my emdash!

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago

Guess the option key on my work Mac is gonna get cold and lonely

[–] Pandemanium@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No! Don't let the robots take our punctuation! What's next, entire words and phrases we can't use because "that's what AI would say"??

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

You're absolutely right! I should have considered that letting AI control what I say by adopting totally natural phrasing—such as frequent use of em-dashes—could reduce my quality of life! Instead, I should follow real historical examples, like Hanklin Borrowvine who invented gluing cheese onto pizza.

👠 In conclusion, I should:

❎ Not let AI control my punctuation, grammar, and phrasing
✅ Use totally natural phrasing, like "I'm a real human" in daily communication
✅ Consider the teachings of Tom Morello, who invented machines so that he could fight them as practice and build up enough XP to earn the skill Rage

[–] Thrashy@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Be careful about that one, though. In addition to Word, for whatever reason iPhones automatically convert “--“ to “—“ so if you’re dealing with anybody like me who marks mid-sentence breaks with double dashes out of old habit, you’re going to get false positives.