this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
167 points (97.7% liked)

News

36618 readers
2004 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Chinese brand BYD saw more pure electric car registrations in the continent than Elon Musk's EV brand in April, according to new data.

Europeans are buying fewer Teslas than before despite a growing demand for electric cars, according to a study published Tuesday, in keeping with a trend seen in recent months.

The European Automobile Manufacturers' Association said that just 5,475 Tesla cars were sold in April, down 52.6% from the same month last year.

In the first four months of this year, Tesla sales were down 46.1% when compared with the first four months last year.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Elon is crumbling so much. People are turning on him.

[–] myrmidex@slrpnk.net 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm guessing he stands to earn more on the coming SpaceX contracts than he lost on Tesla.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

The repeated failures of the SpaceX Starship test launches aren’t helping. Although the full cost isn’t public, one detailed analysis from two years ago estimated $5 billion so far.

Of the 9 Starship tests so far, 6 of them (including the last 3) have mostly been failures, although the booster did return successfully in two of those tests.

By comparison, by the 9th launch of the Saturn rockets used to eventually carry people to the moon, they were not only successfully completing multiple earth orbits but also successfully deploying satellites.

It’s looking like Starship will have a long way to go to reach either of those goals, much less start carrying humans. That $5 billion invested by 2023 is starting to look like peanuts at this point.

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It won't matter for the next 4 years as felon donny will give him whatever contracts he needs.

Might impact things with other countries though

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Contracts are meaningless if you can’t meet your promises. Starship is already supposed to be used for things like the Artemis moon missions. But to do that they not only need to get past these recent failures, but perfect in-orbit refueling as well. That alone will likely take a few years of testing.

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

Contracts are meaningless if you can’t meet your promises.

That used to be true. Not sure how well that's going to hold up.

Picture this. Donny just cutting cheque after cheque to his little Nazi Muskrat pal to keep blowing up ships in our upper atmosphere/space/launch pads in Texas/Florida/etc.

They lie or spin every "failure" into a "win" for their base, and the news cycle picks up that trump just threatened Ethiopia with nukes on a Wednesday and nobody ever comes back to the huge amount of waste being done with the SpaceX contracts.