myrmidex

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Even the Made In America stickers come from China lol

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I would recommend against Proton, it's just a matter of time before their CEO starts tweeting again.

Calendar+contacts: use Baikal

As for email, I went with a cheap no frills service like migadu

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Dirt cheap! Renovation of one of the local stations here was estimated at 37 million. Final amount: 480 million.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Beautiful, thanks!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

This song always does it for me, even after a decade and some years.

Her Space Holiday - Sleepy California

 

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/35691280

Brussels (Belgium) (AFP) – An unconventional Belgian prince will learn on Monday if he has the right to social security on top of his royal allowance after he sued for coverage -- the first time a royal has taken such action against the state in the country's nearly 200-year history.

The 61-year-old Prince Laurent, youngest of three children of the former king and queen, insists his work entitles his family to social security -- and that he is acting out of "principle" rather than for money.

Prince Laurent is no stranger to embarrassing the royal family. His long list of unwelcome antics includes likening his relatives to East Germany's Stasi secret police in 2015.

In 2018, his annual state allowance was cut by 15 percent because he met foreign dignitaries without the federal government's approval.

It was not his first faux pas, but the punishment was unprecedented.

Laurent -- who received 388,000 euros ($425,000) last year from state coffers and lives in his home rent-free -- insists he is not motivated by money.

"This is not about financial means but principle," he told Belgian broadcaster RTBF.

"When a migrant comes here, he registers, he has a right to it. I may be a migrant too, but one whose family established the state in place," he added.

Laurent has pointed to medical costs and his concerns over his family's financial wellbeing since the royal allowance will be cut when he dies.

The prince has had an animal welfare foundation offering free veterinary care in clinics for the past 10 years.

He says the foundation work, alongside dozens of visits representing Belgium and participation on several boards, means he has a busy schedule.

The prince believes he is entitled to social security coverage for independent entrepreneurs.

He took legal action after his application was refused. A first hearing was held in November 2024.

The prince did not take legal action on a "whim", said his lawyer Olivier Rijckaert, in an article in Le Soir newspaper.

Social security is "a right granted by Belgian law to every resident, from the poorest to the biggest billionaire", the lawyer added.

Laurent only receives a salary worth 25 percent of his allowance, since the rest covers professional expenses including travel and wages for a staff member.

This comes to a monthly net wage for the prince of 5,000 euros ($5,480), which is comparable to the "average salary of a senior executive in Belgium", but without the usual "full social security coverage", Rijckaert said.

Laurent and his British wife, Claire, have three children now in their twenties.

Without this coverage, Laurent cannot claim reimbursement for certain medical expenses, or sick pay if he is unable to work.

He is not the only royal to have been unhappy about money.

When King Albert II abdicated in favour of his son Philippe after 20 years of reign in 2013, the ex-monarch found his 923,000 euros ($1.25 million) a year insufficient.

Laurent has lambasted what he calls an attempt to "control" him.

"I never asked for an allowance! I always wanted to work, but I was prevented from doing so," he said in 2023, noting his desire, at the age of 60, to "finally" be able to pursue independent projects.

The judgment will not be delivered in public but sent to the parties in the case on Monday.

[–] [email protected] 87 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (6 children)

Ah yes, that left-wing government with a banker president. I guess everything is regarded as left by Trump.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

How Music Works by David Byrne. It was recommended to me by a colleague when asked about good resources on learning more about music.

I'm only in chapter 3, so far it's been interesting. About how music has adapted since the introduction of recordings, about the shifting perceptions, not only in music but also showmanship, size of venues, choice of instruments. The current chapter is about the different recording media and their impact on the music.

All very interesting, although I do hope it will soon delve deeper into the nitty gritty: notes and intervals, progressions, and all the things I'm still totally unaware of.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Great pick by @realDonaldTrump . 10 years ago, Republicans were the party of big business and Dems stood for the little guys, but today the tables have completely turned. People forget that the current antitrust actions against Big Tech were started under the first Trump admin.

Andy Yen, Proton CEO, on X

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Absolutely awesome!! Where can we get one?!

Great music too btw

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Next to diplomacy, punching power can very well come in an economic form, e.g. still multiple tens of billions of euros flow to Russia to purchase fossil fuels.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The parties I talk about are not a fan of NATO, let that be clear. NATO has multiple authoritarian regimes under its wings, not only Trump but also Erdogan and Orban. Meloni's Italy is not too far off either, so I suppose that makes it hard for leftist parties to get behind it.

 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.it/post/16080182

A collective of pedestrians living in the Brussels is fighting illegal parking by putting humorous stickers on the rear windows of cars parked on the pavement – hindering people wanting to walk or cycle safely.

The sticker read: "Don't be a Putin. Don't annex the pavement."

Picture of the sticker s

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/27050557

Just sharing another video, enjoy!

 

Last June, fans of Comedy Central – the long-running channel behind beloved programmes such as The Daily Show and South Park – received an unwelcome surprise. Paramount Global, Comedy Central’s parent company, unceremoniously purged the vast repository of video content on the channel’s website, which dated back to the late 1990s.

Every Daily Show episode since Jon Stewart took over as host in 1999? Disappeared. The historic remains of The Colbert Report? Disappeared. Presumably, one hopes, those materials remain archived internally somewhere, but for the general masses, they’re kaput. Instead, the links redirect visitors to Paramount+, a streaming service whose offerings pale in comparison. (The service offers recent seasons of the Daily Show to paying subscribers, but only a fraction of the prior archive.)

Such digital demolitions are becoming routine. For fans and scholars of pop culture, 2024 may go down as the year the internet shrank. Despite the immense archiving capabilities of the internet, we’re living through an age of mass deletion, a moment when entertainment and media corporations see themselves not as custodians of valuable cultural history, once freely available, but as ruthless maximisers of profit. Those of us who believe in the historical value of accessing media from the past are paying the price.

 

Caught this gem on the news the other day.

view more: next ›