this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
344 points (98.3% liked)
Politics
980 readers
296 users here now
For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.
Rule 1-3, 6 & 7 No longer applicable
Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.
Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.
The Epstein Files: Trump, Trafficking, and the Unraveling Cover-Up
Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)
Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term
Media owners, CEOs and/or board members
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Y'all are down voting the person speaking truth. 🤷♂️
Yes because it's easier to accept a weak and flawed bill and fight to have it struck down as overboard and unconstitutionally vague (which btw is already in progress) rather then fight and end up with a stronger more easily abused but harder to strike down bill.
That said why are you crying about this move in particular?
You know there are ways around the speaker of the house being inept a. Removal of the speaker quick is simple majority or b. Delivery in person and a motion to bring it under house rules.
Moreover there is only common practice involved in impeachment not bright line regulation or law and the section that allows impeachment allows the house to set it's own rules as they relate to impeachment in which case the house rules are created by the house in total not just by the speaker.
TBH I don't think this is getting struck down in this Senate with it's current makeup of 2 Independents, 53 Republicans and 45 Democrats.
I don't think it's gonna get hot either way. They ignore it and they tell everyone they've done something wrong, why do that when you can do a sham investigation and declare dear leader has done nothing wrong.