politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
"It's not my opinion"
spends the next ten paragraphs expressing that opinion
Insisting that the problem isn't wealth accumulation, but instead "corrupt" wealth that just happens to be accumulated under capitalism is just delusion and denial.
Bernie and AOC are two of the most nationally-favorable politicians in the US, and the core message from both is "wealth inequality is the problem".
I'll just say it again: if democrats run their platform on "cronyism" and not wealth disparity and accumulation, they will continue losing. But don't take my word for it - that's what they've been running on.
Edit:
Lmao, Ken Martin, that you? This is such a boomer take. This is like trying to claim Clinton lost in 2016 because she didn't tweet enough or use the right young-person slang, skibidi
Believe what you want. Contrary to what some profoundly dim people believe, it is possible to write about an opinion of others & explain it to someone who isn't getting it.
That's one theory that isn't widely accepted. The voters who need to be won over don't seem to accept it.
Not at all stated. Maybe you need to read without the filter: some people think it is possible to gain wealth legitimately & to prevent government from enabling illegitimate power.
You're looking at illegitimate power gained through wealth but not any other means, which is shortsighted. We could make everyone poor & still let people gain illegitimate power: that wouldn't satisfy anyone.
They haven't. Neither oligarchs nor kings changes the overall message.
The part of their message that's working for AOC & Sanders isn't necessarily income inequality: they're also raising a populist message against elites like Musk & his fellow billionaires, their exploitation of & disruption of & threats to government programs that serve & protect the people. The message works more broadly than you claim.
Right: Democrats need to try winning, but they better not try to actually win/beat the opposition at tactics they've proven win. So weak.
Nope, I'm saying the wealth is legitimately accumulated, but it's still a problem. Edit: and wealth is power under capitalism
It's widely accepted that wealth can and will be abused, and thats the problem.
Doubtful, and even if it did: Republicans could just as easily run the exact same campaign against the democrats' 'elities', and we're right back where we started.
Class consciousness is the thing democrats haven't tried because they refuse to, and it'll be the thing that prevents them from winning.