this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
1138 points (99.1% liked)

News

36889 readers
3213 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dryfter@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Does the U.S. make anything of value as an export compared to what we import from other countries? Almost everything today has a microchip inside it (except food.....I hope) and I'm pretty sure we import most of the microchips we use in stuff. I think the trade war is going to make our economy MUCH worse pretty quick because we are in an even more global economy than we were when Hitler was in power.

[–] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Are you asking this genuinely? Yes, we do. We are a net exporter of refined petroleum products, we export low sulfur coke for steel production. We export agricultural products, particularly soy beans. We export advanced robotics and pharmaceuticals. I think, granted this is from 15 years ago, but we also export a significant amount of vehicles.

[–] dryfter@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes, I was being genuine with my question (but reading it again I can see how I was a tad snarky). I'm totally ignorant when it comes to this stuff, obviously.

I also genuinely wonder if other countries couldn't figure out how to source that stuff from countries other than the U.S. if they really wanted to. Again, I am ignorant when it comes to this stuff.

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] dryfter@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

In 2023, United States exported a total of $1.86T, making it the number 2 exporter in the world.

🤯

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah it will be much worse since so many things people use are a lot more technologically advanced and therefore more complicated to replace. Like my grandfather was a young man in the 1930s and he used a horse for transportation. Didn't have a landline phone much less a smartphone. Much easier to replace imports with domestic production when most people just needed food and maybe electricity.

Are people now willing to go back to that kind of a life even for a few years under the promise that things will be better someday? It'll take at least two years (in most cases, closer to five) to build a factory to produce many of the products we have.

And who's going to invest the billions of dollars needed to build the factories? Wealthy people under the belief Trump will keep the tariffs in place for years?

[–] Litebit@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Trump seems to forget digital exports.

" The United States is one of the leading countries in the export of software, with a robust and influential software industry that includes major companies such as Microsoft, Oracle, and Adobe.4 As of 2023, the U.S. is also the leading country for digitally-delivered services, exporting $649 billion worth, which represents 15.3% of the world total. ".

Using trump tariff logic, the rest of the world needs to tariffs US to restore software trade imbalances.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

We export a lot of soybeans. Trump will be giving farmers lots of subsidies to pay them back for the counter tariffs (again).

Generally speaking tariffs are harder on the nation that is exporting. China will be hit harder as they struggle to find other buyers.

[–] Litebit@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Americans will still keep buying from china, they will just be paying higher tax to Trump.

China imports inside US have a high enough profit margin and are cheap enough that it probably won't matter to importer to most consumers. A $1 dollar hook being sold for $2.4 dollar won't matter to most people who are paying thousands for their iphones.

Some China stuff will probably get rerouted through lower tariff countries (for "assembly") to enjoy even more profits inside US while still raising prices anyway and blaming Woke Trump Tariffs for it.

Manufacturing won't go back to US soon (if it ever goes back, takes years to build the factories and train the people) so it leaves American no choice but to buy from outside US.

I think consumers might just buy directly from China sites to reduce their cost further instead of buying from a American, middle man importer or those who rebrand china stuff.

I also think some American importers may reduce cost by getting rid of American staff in US either because they think they will sell less or just to raise profit by reducing cost.

[–] scintilla@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

I'm not actually sure that's true with the truly absurd tarriff that trump has levied. Sure the stuff that's on hold will keep getting bought from China but other stuff will almost certainly be cheaper from other countries at this point. Nearly tripling the pre sale cost is not good for business.